Fealey M E, Edwards W D, Giannini C, et al. Complications of endovascular polymers associated with vascular introducer sheaths and metallic coils in 3 patients, with literature review [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2008, 32(9): 1310-1316.
[2]
Shotar E, Law-Ye B, Baronnet-Chauvet F, et al. Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions secondary to endovascular aneurysm therapy: nickel allergy or foreign body reaction? Case series and review of the literature [J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(9): 877-885.
[3]
Shotar E, Labeyrie M A, Biondi A, et al. Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions after intracranial aneurysm endovascular repair: a retrospective French National Registry [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(9): 925-930.
[4]
Ikemura A, Ishibashi T, Otani K, et al. Delayed leukoencephalopathy: a rare complication after coiling of cerebral aneurysms [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2020, 41(2): 286-292.
[5]
Mehta R I, Mehta R I. Hydrophilic polymer embolism: implications for manufacturing, regulation, and postmarket surveillance of coated intravascular medical devices [J]. J Patient Saf, 2021, 17(8): e1069-e1079.
[6]
Moreno Estébanez A, Luna Rodríguez A, Pérez Concha T, et al. Symptomatic intracranial embolic foreign-body reactions after endovascular neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 200: 106323.
[7]
Bakola E, Katsanos A H, Palaiodimou L, et al. Delayed recurrent enhancing white matter lesions complicating coiling of intracranial aneurysm [J]. Eur J Neurol, 2021, 28(7): 2388-2391.
Boyle T, Fernando S L, Steinfort B, et al. Medical treatment of polymeric cerebral granulomatous reactions following endovascular procedures [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2021, 13(11):1032-1036.
[10]
Ulus S, Yakupoglu A, Kararslan E, et al. Reversible intracranial parenchymal changes in MRI after MCA aneurysm treatment with stent-assisted coiling technique; possible nickel allergy [J]. Neuroradiology, 2012, 54(8):897-899.
[11]
Murayama Y, Nien Y L, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years′ experience [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 98(5):959-966.
[12]
Grewal S S, López Del Valle E M, Gupta V, et al. Neurological changes with abnormal brain reactivity following coiling of cerebral aneurysm. Possible reactivity to endovascular devices and material [J]. J Vasc Interv Neurol, 2015, 8:28-36.
[13]
Fanning N F, Willinsky R A, ter Brugge K G. Wall enhancement, edema, and hydrocephalus after endovascular coil occlusion of intradural cerebral aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108(6):1074-1086.
[14]
Hu Y C, Deshmukh V R, Albuquerque F C, et al. Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device [J]. J Neurosurg, 2014, 120(2): 365-374.
[15]
Barnwell S L, D′Agostino A N, Shapiro S L, et al. Foreign bodies in small arteries after use of an infusión microcatheter [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18 (10):1886-1889.
[16]
Mehta R I,Mehta R I. Polymer-induced central nervous system complications following vascular procedures: spectrum of iatrogenic injuries and review of outcomes [J]. Hum Pathol, 2016, 53:178-190.
[17]
Zellner C, Ports T A, Yeghiazarians Y, et al. Sterile radial artery granuloma after transradial procedures: a unique and avoidable complication [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 76 (5):673-676.
[18]
Geisbush T R, Marks M P, Heit J J. Cerebral foreign body reaction due to hydrophilic polymer embolization following aneurysm treatment by pipeline flow diversion device [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2019, 25 (4):447-453.
[19]
Shapiro M, Ollenschleger M D, Baccin C, et al. Foreign body emboli following cerebrovascular interventions: clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic features [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 36(11):2121-2126.
2024, Vol. 35 
