CT肺动脉造影推导的右心室与左心室直径比对急性肺栓塞危险分层及预后的评估价值

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1046 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)推导的右心室(RV)与左心室(LV)直径比,对急性肺栓塞(APE)危险分层及预后的预测效能。方法回顾性分析2019-03至2023-04在武警贵州总队医院接受利伐他班预防急性静脉血栓的211例APE患者的电子医疗记录。根据简化版肺栓塞严重指数(sPESI)、肌钙蛋白检测、超声心动图检查将患者分为低危(n=69)、中低危(n=74)、中高危(n=68)。通过超声心动图评估RV收缩功能障碍(RVD),由影像科专家在CTPA图像上垂直于心脏长轴的单次横向扫描中测量RV和LV直径。随访90 d内的不良复合事件发生情况。结果不良结局APE患者的RV/LV更高(P＜0.05),RV/LV预测APE患者短期预后的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROCAUC)结果为0.784,在最佳截断值(1.02)处,灵敏度79.9%,特异度75.3%。多元Logistics回归分析结果显示,RV/LV直径比＞1.02为APE患者短期预后不良结局的独立危险因素。中高危患者的RV/LV直径比(1.11±0.25)高于低危(0.96±0.18)及中低危(0.99±0.28)患者(F=7.431,P=0.001)。RV/LV直径比预测中高危APE的ROCAUC为0.780。在RV/LV直径比≤1.02的70例患者中,14例(20.0%)通过超声心动图检测到RVD;在＞1.02的134例患者中,77例(57.46%)通过超声心动图检测到RVD。Spearman秩相关分析结果显示,RV/LV直径比与sPESI(r_s=0.289)、肌酸激酶同工酶(r_s=0.291)、D-二聚体(r_s=0.386)呈正相关。结论根据CTPA推导的RV/LV直径比有助于评估APE患者的危险分层和短期不良预后。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马国贤
	陈恒
	秦程军

关键词 ：计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影, 右心室与左心室直径比, 急性肺栓塞, 危险分层, 预后

Abstract：Objective To analyze the predictive effect of the ratio of right ventricle and left ventricle diameter (RV/LV) derived from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) on the risk stratification and prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Methods The electronic medical records of 211 APE patients who received rivataban for the prevention of acute venous thrombosis in Guizhou Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People’ s Armed Police Force from March 2019 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI), troponin detection, and echocardiography, the patients were divided into low-risk (n=69), medium-low risk (n=74), and medium-high risk (n=68). RV systolic dysfunction (RVD) was evaluated by echocardiography, in which RV and LV diameters were measured by imaging department experts in a single transverse scan perpendicular to the long axis of the heart on CTPA images. Adverse composite events were followed up within 90 days. Results RV/LV of APE patients with adverse outcomes was significantly higher (P＜0.05), and the area under the subject working characteristic curve (ROCAUC) of RV/LV for predicting short-term prognosis of APE patients was 0.784, with sensitivity of 79.9% and specificity of 75.3% at the optimal cut-off value (1.02). Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that RV/LV＞1.02 was an independent risk factor for short-term adverse outcome in APE patients. RV/LV (1.11±0.25) in medium-high risk patients was higher than that in low-risk (0.96±0.18) and medium-low risk (0.99±0.28) patients (F=7.431, P=0.001). The ROCAUC for RV/LV predicted APE at high risk was 0.780. Of 70 patients with RV/LV diameter ratio ≤1.02, RVD was detected by echocardiography in 14 (20.0%). Of 134 patients>1.02, RVD was detected by echocardiography in 77 (57.46%) . Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that RV/LV diameter ratio was positively correlated with sPESI (r_s=0.289), creatine kinase Isozyme (r_s=0.291) and D-dimer (r_s=0.386). Conclusions RV/LV diameter ratio derived from CTPA is useful for assessing risk stratification and short-term poor prognosis in patients with APE.

Key words： computed tomography pulmonary angiography diameter ratio of right ventricle to left ventricle acute pulmonary embolism risk stratification prognosis

收稿日期: 2023-11-02

ZTFLH:

R81

作者简介: 马国贤,本科学历,副主任医师。

引用本文:

马国贤, 陈恒, 秦程军. CT肺动脉造影推导的右心室与左心室直径比对急性肺栓塞危险分层及预后的评估价值[J]. 武警医学, 2024, 35(3): 191-196. MA Guoxian, CHEN Heng, QIN Chengjun. Evaluation value of the ratio of right ventricular and left ventricular diameter derived by CT pulmonary angiography on the risk stratification and prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2024, 35(3): 191-196.

链接本文:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/ 或 http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/Y2024/V35/I3/191

[1]	Martinez L C R,McCurdy C M,Maldonado S M,et al. Current management of acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 26(2):65-71.
[2]	刘瑞雪,向波,黄梦婷,等. 年龄休克指数联合N末端脑钠肽前体对急性肺栓塞短期预后的预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学,2022,42(11):942-946.
[3]	Janisset L,Castan M,Poenou G,et al.Cardiac biomarkers in patients with acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(4):541-548.
[4]	Konstantinides S V,Meyer G,Becattini C,et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS)[J]. Eur Heart J,2020,41(4):543-603.
[5]	Ammari Z,Hasnie A A,Ruzieh M,et al.Prognostic value of computed tomography versus echocardiography derived right to left ventricular diameter ratio in acute pulmonary embolism[J].Am J Med Sci,2021, 361(4):445-450.
[6]	Cho S U,Cho Y D,Choi S H,et al.Assessing the severity of pulmonary embolism among patients in the emergency department: utility of RV/LV diameter ratio[J].PLoS One,2020,15(11):e0242340-e0242350.
[7]	中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺栓塞与肺血管病学组,中国医师协会呼吸医师分会肺栓塞与肺血管病工作委员会,全国肺栓塞与肺血管病防治协作组.肺血栓栓塞症诊治与预防指南[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(14):1060-1087.
[8]	Jiménez D,Aujesky D,Moores L,et al.Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism[J].Arch Intern Med,2010, 170(15):1383-1389.
[9]	Konstantinides S V,Meyer G,Becattini C,et al.2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS)[J]. Eur Heart J,2020,41(4):543-603.
[10]	Zanobetti M,Converti C,Conti A,et al.Prognostic value of emergency physician performed echocardiography in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism[J].West J Emerg Med,2013,14(5):509-517.
[11]	左冬晶,曹玉丹,张艳慧,等.动脉血二氧化碳分压联合Wells评分有助于预测急性肺栓塞[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2022,31(8):1056-1060.
[12]	Sobrero M,Montecucco F,Carbone F.CirculatingmicroRNAs for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: still a long way to go[J].Biomed Res Int,2022,2022:4180215-4180221.
[13]	Scatularo C E,Farina J,Cigalini I M,et al.Tromboembolismopulmonaragudoentiempos de SARS-CoV-2: diagnóstico y tratamiento[Acute pulmonary embolism in times of SARS-CoV-2: Diagnostic and therapeutic management][J].Arch Cardiol Mex,2021,91(Suplemento COVID):055-063.
[14]	Yang H,Zhang J,Huan Y,et al.Pentraxin-3 levels relate to the wells score and prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism[J].Dis Markers,2019,2019:2324515-2324520.
[15]	Yu H,Rong W,Yang J, et al.Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (trail): a novel biomarker for prognostic assessment and risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism[J].J Clin Med,2022, 11(13):3908-3919.
[16]	Shayganfar A,Hajiahmadi S,Astaraki M,et al.The assessment of acute pulmonary embolism severity using CT angiography features[J].Int J Emerg Med,2020,13(1):15-19.
[17]	Tu T,Toma C,Tapson V F,et al.A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the flare study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2019, 12(9):859-869.
[18]	Akhoundi N,Langroudi T F,Rajebi H,et al.Computed tomography pulmonary angiography for acute pulmonary embolism: prediction of adverse outcomes and 90-day mortality in a single test[J].Pol J Radiol,2019, 84:e436-e446.
[19]	Liu J,Liu Y,Zhang F,et al.Short-term prognostic value of clinical data in hospitalized patients with intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2022,22(1):335-341.
[20]	张亚斌,陈丽媛,陈殿森.心电图、超声心动图与CTPA在诊断急性肺栓塞中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2020,18(4):54-57.