子宫肌瘤两种切除术式对妊娠结局的比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (707 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To study pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic hystero myomectomy(LM)and trans abdominal hystero myomectomy(TAM).Methods The clinical medical records of 240 patients with fertility demands after hystero myomectomy and delivered from January 2012 to June 2014 in this hospitalwere reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into laparoscopic group (128 cases)and laparotomy group(112 cases) according to operation method. Leiomyoma’s characteristics and pregnancy outcome were analyzed in LM and TAM groups respectively.Results Followed-up to December 2015, the diameter, mean numbers of leiomyoma removed were smaller in the LM group[(6.8±2.0)cm、(2.4±2.1),respectively] than those in the TAM group[(7.6±3.0)cm,(5.6±5.5),respectively; P<0.05)].For the type of uterine fibroids, there were more subserosal fibroids in the LM group, and there were more intramural fibroids and submucosal fibroids in the TAM group. However, the pregnancy rate of LM and TAM was 64.8% versus 62.5% respectively; the incidence of abortion of LM and TAM was 9.38% versus 7.14％respectively; the incidence of premature birth of LM and TAM was 6.25% versus 4.46% respectively. No uterine rupture occurred during pregnancy.Conclusions Both the LM and TAM are proved to be effective and feasible Methods for females who have fertility requirements but suffer from leiomyoma.

Key words： laparotomy laparoscopic myomectomy pregnancy outcome

Received: 01 February 2016

ZTFLH:

R737.33R

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DU Jun
	XIONG Chuanxu
	and ZHANG Meng

Cite this article:

DU Jun,XIONG Chuanxu,and ZHANG Meng. Comparison between the pregnancy outcomes of two different types of hysteromyomectomy[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(8): 764-766.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2016/V27/I8/764

[1]	Sami W M, Heaton R L. The role of laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine fibroids[J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2011,23(4):273-277.
[2]	蔡兴苑,卢丹,代荫梅,等. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后影响患者妊娠结局的多因素分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015,15(9):769-772.
[3]	李宏,任红莲,吴琳.腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠疗效的比较[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2015,36(10):44-47.
[4]	King R, Overton C. Management of fibroids should be tailored to the patient[J]. The Practitioner,2011,255(1738):19-23.
[5]	李孟慧, 冷金花, 史精华,等. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局的比较[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2011,46(9):669-673.
[6]	Stamilio D M, DeFranco E, Pare E, et al. Short Interpregnancy Interval Risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007,110:1075-1082.
[7]	Metwally M, Farquhar C M, Li T C. Is another meta-analysis on the effects of intramural fibroids on reproductive outcomes needed?[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011, 23(1):2-14.
[8]	Saravelos S H,Yan J,Rehmani H,et al. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011,26(12): 3274-3279.
[9]	Machupalli S, Norkus E P, Mukherjee T K, et al. Abdominal myomect-omy increases fertility outcome[J]. Gynecol Obstet, 2013,3(2):144-148.
[10]	Pitter M C, Gargiulo A R, Bonaventura L M,et al. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy[J]. Hum Reprod,2013,28(1):99-108.
[11]	Bhave C P,Franik S,Pouwer A W,et al. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014,10: 4638.
[12]	高青,陈哲,梁梅英.开腹和腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术后患者妊娠结局临床分析[J]. 中华妇产科临床杂志,2015,16(4):325-325.
[13]	姚恒,李静文.不同术式子宫肌瘤剔除术临床效果和妊娠结局的比较[J]. 中华全科医学, 2013,11(8):1214-1215.
[14]	胡金艳,郭红霞,胡水旺,等.妊娠期高血压疾病与正常孕妇尿液蛋白质组分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2013,29(6):446-450.
[15]	蔡叶萍,邓丽贞,李荣淘.不同诊断标准诊断妊娠期糖尿病的相关探讨[J].中国计划生育学杂志, 2014,22(7):471-474.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 709-710.