剖宫产切口憩室发病危险因素探讨

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (535 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect.Methods Totally 128 patients who had received cesarean section were recruited in the study. Fifty-six of the cases came to visit a doctor because of previous cesarean scar defect between January 2013 and December 2015, while the other seventy-two cases had their scars healed under the vaginal ultrasound and with no symptoms related to previous cesarean scar defect .The medical records included general conditions(age, uterine position, gestational age, gravidity and parity history and neonatal weight) and perioperative conditions (pregnancy complications, puerperal infection, time of operation, and ways of incision suture) were collected. Risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect were analyzed.Results There were more cases of retroflexed uterus, delivery, cesarean sections, patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, cesarean sections during the second stage of labor, and more cases of single layer closure incision (P<0.05) in the group with previous cesarean scar defect. The risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect were the retroflexed uterus(OR=0.370, P<0.05), multiple cesarean sections(OR=0.147, P<0.01), cesarean sections during the second stage of labor (OR=0.543, P<0.05), and incisions with single layer closure(OR=11.126, P<0.05).Conclusions Rigorous control of indications, proper timing of cesarean sections, and improving surgical expertise are effective means of reducing the risk of previous cesarean scar defect.

Key words： cesarean section postoperative complications diverticulum risk factors

Received: 10 June 2016

ZTFLH:

R719.8

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Jingxuan
	LU Dan
	and WEI Wei

Cite this article:

WANG Jingxuan,LU Dan,and WEI Wei. Analysis of risk factors for previous cesarean scar defect[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2017, 28(3): 265-267.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2017/V28/I3/265

[1]	Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section [J]. BJOG: An Inter J Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2010, 117(9):1119-1126.
[2]	Uppal T, Lanzarone V, Mongelli M. Sonographically detected caesarean section scar defects and menstrual irregularity [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 31(5):413-416.
[3]	Vikhareva Osser O, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009,34(1):90-97.
[4]	Melo-Cerda I. Cesarean scar defect [J]. Ginecol Obstet Mex, 2014, 82(8):530-534.
[5]	Tower A M, Frishman G N. Cesarean Scar Defects: An Underrecognized Cause of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Other Gynecologic Complications [J]. J Minim Invasive Gyneco, 2013, 20(5):562-572.
[6]	Voet L F, Bij De Vaate A M, Veersema S, et al. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding [J]. BJOG: An Inter J Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2014, 121(2):236-244.
[7]	Bij D A, Voet L F, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43(4):372-382.
[8]	韦春姣,陈立斌,冯淑英,等. 剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损相关因素分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2012,19(9):777-780.
[9]	Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, et al. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(5):453-460.
[10]	Lin Y H, Hwang J L, Seow K M. Endometrial ablation as a treatment for postmenstrual bleeding due to cesarean scar defect [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2010, 111(1):88-89.
[11]	Luo L, Niu G, Wang Q, et al. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(4):454-458.
[12]	Wang C B, Chiu W W C, Lee C Y, et al. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009, 34(1):85-89.
[13]	王怡佳,陈燕,韩萍,等. 剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室形成影响因素分析[J]. 河北联合大学学报(医学版), 2016,16(2):115-118.
[14]	王艺桦,马琳,阚艳敏,等. 经阴道超声观察剖宫产术后瘢痕憩室的结构特点及其危险因素分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2016,17(2):158-161.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 709-710.