武警官兵腹股沟疝修补术不同术式应用的回顾性研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (7)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (705 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy, and to explore the selection of surgica Methods for military inpatients.Methods The clinical data of cases of inguinal hernia treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2018 was analyzed retrospectively, and the operative effect, complications and postoperative recovery were summarized.Results Operations on 128 cases were successful. The duration of surgery in TAPP group was significantly longer than that in conventional operation group and TEP group (P<0.05). The postoperative length of hospital stay in the conventional operation group was longer than that in TAPP group and TEP group (P<0.05). The VAS score of conventional operation group was significantly higher than that of TAPP group and TEP group on the second day (P<0.05). One month after operation, the number of cases with an IPQ score of 0 and involved in daily training, fixed duty and 3-kilometer cross-country running in the conventional operation group was significantly smaller than that in TAPP group and TEP group(P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the number of cross-country runners in the conventional operation group was significantly smaller than that in TAPP group and TEP group (P<0.05).Conclusions Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has the advantages of minimal invasion, mild pain, quick recovery and fewer complications. Military inpatients can resume their daily training and duty earlier. TEP operations are worth popularizing in military hospitals.

Key words： laparoscopy hernia, inguinal hernia hernia repair

Received: 10 July 2018

ZTFLH:

R656.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	NIE Yong
	WANG Xiaojin
	CHANG Haosheng
	HUANG Jianfeng
	QIAN Linfeng

Cite this article:

NIE Yong,WANG Xiaojin,CHANG Haosheng等. Retrospective study of different surgical procedures for inguinal hernia repair of military inpatients[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2018, 29(11): 1032-1035.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2018/V29/I11/1032

[1]	孙中伟,沈海玉,李戈,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前和全腹膜外途径腹股沟疝修补术的应用选择[J].中华疝和腹壁外科学杂志(电子版),2016,10(5):376-378.
[2]	Fränneby U, Gunnarsson U, Andersson M, et al. Validation of an inguinal pain questionnaire for assessment of chronic pain after groin hernia repair [J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(4): 488-493.
[3]	Simons M P, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 343-403.
[4]	中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科分会疝与腹壁外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院.腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2013,7(33): 566-570.
[5]	孙艳军,龚仁华,钟兴国,等.耻骨肌孔解剖结构对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的意义[J].武警医学,2016,27(12): 1193-1195.
[6]	成晓舟,屈坤鹏,景恩义,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中采取疝囊剥离与横断处理治疗型腹股沟疝的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(10): 780-782.
[7]	Feng B, He Z R, Li J W, et al. Feasibility of incremental laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair development in China: an 11-year experience [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(2): 258-265.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 709-710.