泌尿外科达芬奇机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜围术期指标比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (565 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the Da Vinci surgical system with traditional laparoscopy in the field of urology.Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical data of 40 patients who underwent surgery with Da Vinci robots at the Department of Urology of the Rocket General Hospital between March 2014 and January 2018 and of another 40 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery.Results The intraoperative blood loss volume of the Da Vinci group was (341.35±52.01) ml, which was significantly smaller than that of the laparoscopic group (367.78±50.04) ml. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The exhaust time of the Da Vinci group was (40.71±8.59) h, and the time of first postoperative ambulation (42.97±11.80) h was also significantly earlier than that of the laparoscopic group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The cost of surgery in the Da Vinci group was higher than that in the laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Da Vinci group than in the laparoscopic group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusions Surgery with the Da Vinci robot-assisted system can improve the accuracy of surgery, reduce intraoperative bleeding, promote recovery and shorten hospital stay.

Key words： Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy calicoplasty radical prostatectomy radical cystectomy

Received: 20 January 2019

ZTFLH:

R699.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	MENG Rui
	SUN Bo
	ZOU Lian

Cite this article:

MENG Rui,SUN Bo,ZOU Lian. Comparison of Da Vinci Robot-assisted and Traditional laparoscopic perioperative indicators[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(6): 496-498.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2019/V30/I6/496

[1]	周宁新,邹练,周丁华,等.机器人微创外科手术探索与实践[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:282-288.
[2]	谢立平, 白宇. 机器人前列腺癌根治术[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志, 2006(5):400-402.
[3]	高江平, 崔亮. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2008, 16(2):100-102.
[4]	贾卓敏, 马鑫, 艾星, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统在泌尿外科手术中的优势[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2018,23(5):13-16.
[5]	Chen S,Chen J Z,Zhan Q,et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(12):3698-3711.
[6]	Senthilnathan P, Gurumurthy S S, Gul S I, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a rertiary-care center in south India[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015,25(4):295-300.
[7]	Song K B , Kim S C , Hwang D W , et al. Matched case-control analysis comparing Laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(1):146-155.
[8]	Croome K P, Farnell M B, Que F G, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(4):633-640.
[9]	Dokmak Sfteriche F S,Aussilhou B.Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors[J]. J Am Coll Surg,2015, 220(5):831-838.
[10]	Luke P P W, Girvan A R, Omar M, et al. Laparoscopic robotic pyeloplasty using the zeus telesurgical system[J]. Can J Uro, 2004, 11(5):2396-2400.
[11]	Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Kurokawa S, et al. Extravesical robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial experience in Japan with the ureteral advancement technique[J]. Int J Uro, 2014, 21(10):1016-1021.
[12]	Branco A W, Kondo W, Filho A J B, et al. A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy[J]. Clinics, 2008, 63(6):795-800.
[13]	Chen W, Zheng R, Baade P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China 2015[J]. Ca Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132.
[14]	Ploussard G, Alexandre D L, Moulin M , et al. comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(3):610-619.
[15]	陈文政, 张旭. 达芬奇机器人在中国大陆地区泌尿外科的发展现状[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 3(5):257-258.
[16]	魏志成, 王春喜. 达芬奇外科手术机器人系统概述及其在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 武警医学, 2017,28(7):752-754.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 709-710.