SRM-Ⅳ眩晕诊疗系统对前庭神经元炎引起的眩晕辅助治疗效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (585 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the SRM-IV vertigo diagnosis and treatment system in adjuvant treatment of vertigo caused by vestibular neuritis.Methods One hundred and forty-four patients with vestibular neuritis diagnosed in our hospital between 2017 and 2018 were randomly and equally divided into two groups: the control group that was treated with routine drugs and the treatment group that was additionally treated with the SRM-Ⅳ vertigo diagnosis and treatment system. The efficacy and the time taken to achieve curative effect were evaluated and compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate was 95.8% in the treatment group and 79.2% in the control group, with significant difference (χ²= 9.143,P=0.002). The average time taken to achieve curative effect in the treatment group was 2 days into vertigo, shorter than 4 days in the control group(Z=2.060,P=0.000).Vomiting lasted one day in the treatment group,shorter than 2 days in the control group(Z=1.873,P=0.002).Conclusions The SRM-Ⅳ vertigo diagnosis and treatment system based on conventional symptomatic treatment can effectively alleviate vertigo caused by vestibular neuritis and shorten the duration of vertigo and vomiting.

Key words： SRM-Ⅳ vertigo diagnosis and treatment system vestibular neuritis vertigo

Received: 26 March 2019

ZTFLH:

R276.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YAN Yaping
	CUI Chengmin
	LIU Ping
	and ZHANG Shuxiang

Cite this article:

YAN Yaping,CUI Chengmin,LIU Ping等. Therapeutic effect of SRM-Ⅳ vertigo diagnosis and treatment system against vertigo caused by vestibular neuritis[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 669-671.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2019/V30/I8/669

[1]	王朝霞,徐先荣.前庭神经元炎的诊治与航空医学鉴定[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017,31(8):82-86.
[2]	Baloh R W. Clinical practice. Vestibular neuritis.[J].N Engl J Med,2003, 348(11):1027-1032.
[3]	刘钢,翟翔.前庭神经元炎引起眩晕的诊断、鉴别诊断及治疗原则[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2005,5(5): 308-309.
[4]	闫亚平,刘有凤,张淑香,等.听神经瘤误诊误治1例[J].武警医学, 2014, 25(5):512-513.
[5]	王泳.眩晕的发病机制与分类[J].中国社区医师, 2004, 20(8):7-8.
[6]	刘媛.应用纳络酮治疗前庭神经元炎引起眩晕的效果分析[J].海峡药学,2013,25(7):161.
[7]	赵洪鉴.银丹心脑通软胶囊治疗前庭神经元炎的临床观察[J].中国社区医师(医学专业), 2012, 14(33):166.
[8]	原红艳,张淑香. SRM -Ⅳ前庭功能诊疗系统治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕疗效分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2014(3):308-310.
[9]	Mandalà M, Santoro G P, Awrey J, et al. Vestibular neuritis: recurrence and incidence of secondary benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Acta Otolaryngol,2010, 130(5):565-567.
[10]	Balatsouras D G, Koukoutsis G, Ganelis P, et al. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo secondary to vestibular neuritis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 271(5):919-924.
[11]	Deveze A, Bernarddemanze L, Xavier F, et al. Vestibular compensation and vestibular rehabilitation. Current concepts and new trends.[J]. Neurophysiol Clin,2014, 44(1):49-57.
[12]	陈瑛, 赵忠新, 庄建华,等. 前庭康复在急性前庭神经炎治疗中的效果评价[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2015, 44(5):61-63.
[13]	张素珍. 眩晕症的诊断与治疗[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2014: 264-265.
[14]	普朗斯坦, 伦珀特, 赵钢,等.眩晕和头晕: 实用入门手册[M]. 北京:华夏出版社, 2012:64-68.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(1): 77-78.