牙科盾构技术与传统即刻种植术临床效果对比的Meta分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1589 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of the socket-shield technique and conventional immediate implantation. Methods Such electronic databases as Cochrane library, Science Direct, Pubmed, Wanfang, CJFD, VIP, CQVIP and CBM were searched. Meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.4.1. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 238 implants were included. The socket-shield technique had the same success rate(100%)and initial stability[MD=0.58(－0.24,1.41),P=0.16>0.05] as the conventional immediate implantation (CII). The amount of vertical[MD=－0.49(－0.54,－0.45),P<0.05] and horizontal[MD=－0.26(－0.39,－0.12),P<0.05] bone resorption at 6 months after operation was smaller than that of CII, so was the amount of horizontal bone resorption at 12 months MD=－0.83[－0.91,－0.75] (P<0.05). A better aesthetic effect around the implant was achieved at 12 months after operation MD=1.30[0.93,1.66] (P<0.05). Conclusions The socket-shield technique can reduce the absorption of the labio-buccal bone plate and improve the aesthetic effect.

Key words： socket-shield immediate implantation aesthetic area Meta-analysis

Received: 14 February 2021

ZTFLH:

R782

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	KANG Shuai
	CAO Junkai
	HU Nan
	GU Bin
	WANG Yibo
	JIANG Yi

Cite this article:

KANG Shuai,CAO Junkai,HU Nan等. Clinical outcomes of socket-shield technique and conventional immediate implantation: a Meta analysis[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2021, 32(6): 518-522.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2021/V32/I6/518

[1]	Schulte W, Kleineikenscheidt H, Schareyka R, et al. Concept and testing of the Tübingen immediate implant[J]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, 1978, 33(5): 319-325.
[2]	Scropp L. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(4): 480-487.
[3]	Chen S T, Darby I B, Reynolds E C. A prospective clinical study ofnon-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(5): 552-562.
[4]	Araujo M G, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol,2005,32(2):212-218.
[5]	刘洪臣, 王培欢. 上颌骨结构变化对老年人种植修复的影响[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志,2018,16(1):1-5.
[6]	Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, et al. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2008, 35(10): 906-913.
[7]	Tonetti M S, Cortellini P, Graziani F, et al. Immediate versus delayedimplant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2017, 44(2): 215-224.
[8]	Abd-Elrahman A, Shaheen M, Askar N, et al. Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2020,22(3):1-10.
[9]	Esposito M, Grusovin M G, Polyzos I P, et al. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2010, 3(3): 189-205.
[10]	Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment-a pilot study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(1): 71-82.
[11]	Siormpas K D, Mitsias M E, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, et al. Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the "root-membrane" technique: clinical results up to 5 years post loading[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(6): 1397-1405.
[12]	房俊艳, 王明臻, 宋倩, 等. 牙片屏障即刻种植术[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2020,14(3):197-199.
[13]	Hurzeler M B, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010, 37(9): 855-862.
[14]	Bumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment-A pilot study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2013,17(1):71-82.
[15]	Bramanti E, Norcia A, Cicciù M, et al. Postextraction dental implant in the aesthetic zone, socket shield technique versus conventional protocol[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(4): 1037-1041.
[16]	许亚梅, 黄弘, 王黎, 等. 改良盾构术与传统即刻种植术的临床效果对比研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(5): 490-495.
[17]	Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6): 639-644.
[18]	Sun C, Zhao J, Liu Z, et al. Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket:hield Technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical study [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 31(2):181-192.
[19]	Tiwari S, Bedi R S, Wadhwani P, et al. Comparison of immediate implant placement following extraction with and without socket-shield technique in esthetic region[J]. J Maxil Oral Surg, 2019, 19(4): 552-560.
[20]	张宾, 孙丽华, 张俊花, 等. 上颌美学区改良盾构术与常规不翻瓣即刻种植即刻修复的短期效果比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2019,24(34):5514-5519.
[21]	闫圣杰, 周聪, 刘金, 等. 上颌前牙区应用根膜技术即刻种植的临床效果观察[D]. 济南:山东大学口腔医学院, 2019.
[22]	Fürhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, et al. Immediate restoration of immediate implants in the esthetic zone of the maxilla via the copy-abutment technique: 5-year follow-up of pink esthetic scores [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(4): 28-37.
[23]	Yan Q, Xiao L Q, Su M Y, et al. Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(3): 1327-1340.
[24]	Araujo M G, Silva C O, Misawa M, et al. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn?[J]. Periodontol, 2015, 68(5): 122-134.
[25]	Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 20(2): 122-129.