|
|
|
| Comparison of two surgical methods for C3 distal radius fractures |
| WU Lei1, WANG Yanhao2, WU Wu3 |
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Physiotherapy, Tianjin Municipal Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force,Tianjin 300252, China;
2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Physiotherapy, Xinjiang Autonomous Regional Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Urumqi 830002, China;
3. the Second Department of Characteristic Specialty,Hunan Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Changsha 410006, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the difference of two surgical methods for C3 distal radius fractures.Methods Clinical data of 49 patients with C3 distal radius fractures treated at Xinjiang Autonomous Regional Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force from March 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 28 cases were treated with external fixation brackets combined with Kirschner wires (stent group) and 21 cases were treated with T-plate (plate group). Based on the results of the last follow-up after surgery, imaging measurements were conducted to evaluate the ulnar deviation angle and palmar inclination angle of the affected side of the two groups of patients, and the active range of motion of the affected side was measured and statistically analyzed. PRWE score was used to understand the impact of the function of the affected limb on the patient's daily life and the patient's satisfaction with the therapeutic effect.Results All patients were followed up for 12 months. The recovery of ulnar deviation angle (22.23°±1.36°) in the stent group was better than that in the steel plate group (21.09°±1.19°), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The postoperative ulnar deviation angle of the wrist joint in the stent group (27.04°±2.58°) was greater than that in the steel plate group (25.24°±3.07°), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The PRWE score of the stent group was (17.21±4.78), and that of the steel plate group was (20.71±5.58), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05).Conclusions The surgical treatment of C3 distal radius fractures with external fixation brackets combined with Kirschner wires can help restore the ulnar deviation angle and ulnar deviation function, achieve good clinical satisfaction, and is characterized by flexible intraoperative operation method, which has certain advantages for cases with high degree of comminution and is worthy of clinical use.
|
|
Received: 05 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [5] |
Vannabouathong C,Hussain N,Guerra Farfan E,et al. Interventions for distal radius fractures:a network Meta analysis of randomized trials[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2019,27(13):e596-e605.
|
| [1] |
黄 坤,李 晔. 闭合复位外固定治疗与手术内固定治疗老年桡骨远端骨折患者的效果对比[J].医疗装备,2022,35(6):80-82.
|
| [6] |
王浩森, 吴伟山, 滕加文. 两种不同固定方式治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的疗效观察[J].中医外治杂志,2021,30(2):40-42.
|
| [2] |
Rundgren J, Bojan A, Mellstrand Navarro C, et al. Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23 394 fractures from the national Swedish fracture register [J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1):88.
|
| [7] |
程 功, 郑万平, 冉文龙,等. 低切迹三叉戟桡骨远端锁定板治疗老年桡骨远端C型骨折的临床观察[J]. 当代医学,2022,28(19):25-28.
|
| [3] |
Satake H,Hanaka N,Honma R,et al.Complications of distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate fixation[J].Orthopedics,2016,39(5):e893-e896.
|
| [8] |
魏小康, 王传舜, 李豪青. 经掌背侧联合入路内固定术与掌侧入路万向锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的效果[J]. 上海医学, 2021,44(5):343-347.
|
| [4] |
Li Y,Zhou Y,Zhang X,et al.Incidence of complications and secondary procedure following distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate(VLP)[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):295.
|
| [9] |
郭惠康, 刘乐泉, 潘晋平,等. 掌侧微创切口锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(9):983-985.
|
| [5] |
Vannabouathong C,Hussain N,Guerra Farfan E,et al. Interventions for distal radius fractures:a network Meta analysis of randomized trials[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2019,27(13):e596-e605.
|
| [10] |
刘建飞, 朱 宁. 掌侧入路锁定钢板内固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的效果及对腕关节功能的影响[J].中外医学研究,2023,21(25):19-22.
|
| [6] |
王浩森, 吴伟山, 滕加文. 两种不同固定方式治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的疗效观察[J].中医外治杂志,2021,30(2):40-42.
|
| [11] |
林炳基,郭培义,张子宏,等. 掌背侧联合入路植骨钢板治疗老年C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,7(5):284-290.
|
| [7] |
程 功, 郑万平, 冉文龙,等. 低切迹三叉戟桡骨远端锁定板治疗老年桡骨远端C型骨折的临床观察[J]. 当代医学,2022,28(19):25-28.
|
| [12] |
李跃松, 王京怀. 桡骨远端 C3 型骨折不同治疗方法的回顾性研究[J]. 实用手外科杂志,2021,35(1):55-57.
|
| [8] |
魏小康, 王传舜, 李豪青. 经掌背侧联合入路内固定术与掌侧入路万向锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的效果[J]. 上海医学, 2021,44(5):343-347.
|
| [13] |
王瑞杰, 房居颖, 张 丽,等. 单臂一体可调式外固定支架配合克氏针撬拨复位联合消定膏治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床效果[J].中国医药科学,2023,13(12):149-153.
|
| [9] |
郭惠康, 刘乐泉, 潘晋平,等. 掌侧微创切口锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(9):983-985.
|
| [14] |
章学超. 桡骨远端骨折不同术式的效果研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2023, 28(4):696-698.
|
| [10] |
刘建飞, 朱 宁. 掌侧入路锁定钢板内固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的效果及对腕关节功能的影响[J].中外医学研究,2023,21(25):19-22.
|
| [15] |
袁术鹏,张兴平,孙 研,等. 外固定架与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折Meta 分析[J]. 中国骨伤,2021,34(5):429-437.
|
| [11] |
林炳基,郭培义,张子宏,等. 掌背侧联合入路植骨钢板治疗老年C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,7(5):284-290.
|
| [12] |
李跃松, 王京怀. 桡骨远端 C3 型骨折不同治疗方法的回顾性研究[J]. 实用手外科杂志,2021,35(1):55-57.
|
| [13] |
王瑞杰, 房居颖, 张 丽,等. 单臂一体可调式外固定支架配合克氏针撬拨复位联合消定膏治疗桡骨远端骨折的临床效果[J].中国医药科学,2023,13(12):149-153.
|
| [14] |
章学超. 桡骨远端骨折不同术式的效果研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2023, 28(4):696-698.
|
| [15] |
袁术鹏,张兴平,孙 研,等. 外固定架与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折Meta 分析[J]. 中国骨伤,2021,34(5):429-437.
|
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 35 
