四种乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体试剂盒检测人乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体效果比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (596 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析商品化试剂盒检测人乙型肝炎病毒(乙肝)表面抗体(抗-HBs)之间的差异。方法本院实验标本252份,分别用雅培I2000定量试剂盒、罗氏e601定量试剂盒、安图Auto Lumo A2000定量检测试剂盒和国内主流酶联免疫法定性试剂盒(上海科华)检测人乙肝表面抗体,以假定金标准对各厂家的阴、阳性结果进行比对分析,并对3个定量检测系统进行量值相关性分析。结果 4种乙肝表面抗体试剂与假定金标准相比,灵敏度和特异性都达到了93%以上,其中安图和罗氏的灵敏度和特异性最高,达到了98%以上;罗氏试剂盒的跃登指数(灵敏度+特异性－100%)最高,为99.3%;与金标准比较,3种化学发光试剂盒检测结果无统计学差异(P>0.05),而酶联免疫法定性试剂盒检测结果有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论主流乙肝表面抗体试剂盒在检验乙肝表面抗体时均存在一定的假阳性或假阴性,量值相关性较好,不影响临床应用分析。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张小丽
	王瑞玲
	宋娜
	王文静
	张翠
	张学东
	王冲冲
	杨晓莉

关键词 ：表面抗体, 金标准, 灵敏度, 特异性, 量值相关性

Abstract：Objective To study four commercially available assays for antibody to hepatitis B virus surface antigen. Methods A total of 252 specimens were tested by Abbott i2000、Roche e601、Autobio AutoLumoA2000 and a ELISA kit, respectively,and the quantitative results and the performance characteristics of the different test systems were compared. Results The sensitivity and specificity of different manufacturer kits for Anti-HBs were beyond 93%. The detection rates of compared CLIA(Chemiluminescence Immunoassay) commercial Anti-HBs reagents had no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions The four commercial Anti-HBs reagents have false positive and false negative results; the correlation analysis for quantitative results is beyond 0.85.

Key words： antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen gold standard sensitivity specificity correlation analysis

收稿日期: 2014-06-13

ZTFLH:

R392.33

通讯作者: 杨晓莉,E-mail:yangxiaolitwins@163.com E-mail: zxl_5021@sina.com

作者简介: 张小丽,本科学历,技师

引用本文:

张小丽,王瑞玲,宋娜,王文静,张翠,张学东,王冲冲,杨晓莉. 四种乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体试剂盒检测人乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体效果比较[J]. 武警医学, 2014, 25(12): 1209-1211. ZHANG Xiaoli,WANG Ruiling,SONG Na, WANG Wenjing, ZHANG Cui,ZHANG Xuedong, WANG Chongchong,and YANG Xiaoli. Comparison of four commercially available assays for antibody to hepatitis B virus surface antigen. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2014, 25(12): 1209-1211.

链接本文:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/ 或 http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/Y2014/V25/I12/1209

[1]	张学东,张泉,谢惠波,等.不同厂家试剂盒检测人血清乙肝表面抗体浓度值相关性分析[J].科技信息,2009,7: 362-363.
[8]	官燕飞,彭建明,陈艳玲,等. 2种全自动化学发光免疫检测系统低值乙肝表面抗体定量测定结果的比较[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2013,34(13):1740-1742.
[2]	ZHANG J M,XU Y,WANG X Y,et al. Coexistence of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg) and heterologous subtypespecific antibodies to HBsAg among patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection[J].Clin Infect Dis,2007,44(9):1161-1169.
[9]	Yu Chen, Wei Wu, Lan-juan Li,et al.Comparison of the results for three automated immunoassay systems in determining serum HBV markers[J].Clinica Chimica Acta,2006,372: 129-133.
[3]	中华医学会肝病学分会、中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎指南[J]. 胃肠病学杂志, 2006, 11(9):550-557.
[4]	郝钦芳,周广军,张丽萍,等. 化学发光法和酶联免疫法检测人血清乙肝表面抗体浓度值差异性分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志,2009,19(10):2330-2331.
[5]	Huzly D, Schenk W,Jilg,et al.Comparison of Nine Commercially Available Assays for Quantification of Antibody Response to Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen[J]. Clin Microbiol, 2008,46(4): 1298-1306.
[6]	王小明,刘平.乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体化学发光定量检测方法的建立[J]. 实验与检验医学,2010,28(6):597.
[7]	赵秀英,陈俊梅,王文静,等.电化学发光法和ELISA法检测HBV表面抗体结果的比较与分析[J].北京医学,2011,33(6):461-463.
[8]	官燕飞,彭建明,陈艳玲,等. 2种全自动化学发光免疫检测系统低值乙肝表面抗体定量测定结果的比较[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2013,34(13):1740-1742.
[9]	Yu Chen, Wei Wu, Lan-juan Li,et al.Comparison of the results for three automated immunoassay systems in determining serum HBV markers[J].Clinica Chimica Acta,2006,372: 129-133.