Abstract:Objective To identify the overall satisfaction rate in patients after posterior stabilized TKA and the satisfaction rate of particular functional deficits or residual symptoms. Methods 1465 patients who received primary posterior stabilized TKA in this hospital were investigated. A Total Knee Satisfaction Questionnaire consisting of the overall satisfaction with surgery and the satisfaction rate of each of 15 specific functions and residual symptoms was developed, validated and mailed to these patients at least 1 year after knee replacement. Results The questionnaire was returned from 1173 patients (1588 posterior-stabilized TKAs). The overall satisfaction rate was 87.3%. The top 6 unsatisfactory items were sitting with legs crossed (dissatisfaction rate of 55.2%), squatting (52.1%), walking fast or jogging (45.2%), knee noise (34.6%), abnormal feeling in knee (31.4%), and mounting stairs (28.7%). Conclusions Approximately 1 in 8 patients are dissatisfied with overall outcome of their primary posterior stabilized TKAs. A low 1-year WOMAC pain score significantly influences patient dissatisfaction.
Kwon S K, Kang Y G, Kim S J, et al. Correlations between commonly used clinical outcome scales and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthrop, 2010, 25(7): 1125-1130.
[3]
Lewis S, Price M, Dwyer K A, et al. Development of a scale to assess performance following primary total knee arthroplasty [J]. Value Health, 2014, 17(4):350-359.
[1]
Lieberman J R, Dorey F, Shekelle P, et al. Differences between patients’ and physicians’ evaluations [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1996, 78(6):835-838.
[4]
Anderson J G, Wixson R L, Tsai D, et al. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75 [J]. J Arthrop, 1996, 11(7):831-840.
[2]
Kwon S K, Kang Y G, Kim S J, et al. Correlations between commonly used clinical outcome scales and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthrop, 2010, 25(7): 1125-1130.
[3]
Lewis S, Price M, Dwyer K A, et al. Development of a scale to assess performance following primary total knee arthroplasty [J]. Value Health, 2014, 17(4):350-359.
[5]
Noble P C, Conditt M A, Cook K F, et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 452:35-43.
[4]
Anderson J G, Wixson R L, Tsai D, et al. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75 [J]. J Arthrop, 1996, 11(7):831-840.
[6]
Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden [J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000, 71(3):262-267.
[7]
Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(9):1172-1179.
[5]
Noble P C, Conditt M A, Cook K F, et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 452:35-43.
[6]
Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden [J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000, 71(3):262-267.
[8]
Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement: results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80(2):163-173.
[7]
Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(9):1172-1179.
[9]
Heck D A, Robinson R L, Partridge C M, et al. Patient outcomes after knee replacement [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 356:93-110.
[10]
Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, Davis A M, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? [J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468:57-63.
[8]
Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement: results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80(2):163-173.
[9]
Heck D A, Robinson R L, Partridge C M, et al. Patient outcomes after knee replacement [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 356:93-110.
[11]
Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee [J]. J Rheumatol, 1988, 15(12):1833-1840.
[10]
Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, Davis A M, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? [J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468:57-63.
[12]
Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire [J]. J Rheumatol, 2002, 29(12):2473-2476.
[13]
Du H, Tang H, Gu J M, et al. Patient satisfaction after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a functional specific analysis [J]. The Knee, 2014, 21(4):866-870.
[11]
Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee [J]. J Rheumatol, 1988, 15(12):1833-1840.
[14]
Baker P N, Vander Meulen J H, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the national joint registry for England and Wales [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(7):893-900.
[12]
Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire [J]. J Rheumatol, 2002, 29(12):2473-2476.
[15]
Brander V A, Stulberg S D, Adams A D, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 416:27-36.
[13]
Du H, Tang H, Gu J M, et al. Patient satisfaction after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a functional specific analysis [J]. The Knee, 2014, 21(4):866-870.
[16]
Elson D W, Brenkel I J. Predicting pain after total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(7):1047-1053.
[17]
Luo S X, Su W, Zhao J M. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis [J]. J Arthrop, 2011, 26(6):847-854.
[14]
Baker P N, Vander Meulen J H, Lewsey J, et al. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the national joint registry for England and Wales [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(7):893-900.
[18]
Nunley R M, Nam D, Berend K R, et al. New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?[J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 6:56-58.
[15]
Brander V A, Stulberg S D, Adams A D, et al. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, 416:27-36.
[16]
Elson D W, Brenkel I J. Predicting pain after total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(7):1047-1053.
[17]
Luo S X, Su W, Zhao J M. High-flexion vs conventional prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis [J]. J Arthrop, 2011, 26(6):847-854.
[18]
Nunley R M, Nam D, Berend K R, et al. New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?[J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 6:56-58.