Clinical efficacy of three kinds of surgical treatment for multi-episode anal fistula
LOU Yingbo1,2 and JIN Weisen2
1. Clinical College of Anhui Medical University Graduate School of the General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Hefei 230032, China; 2..Anorectal Diseases Research Institute, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Beijing100039, China
Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of three kinds of surgical treatment for multi-episode anal fistula.Methods 240 patients with anal abscess fistula admitted in this hospital from May 2013 to May 2014 treated over three times were recruited. They were divided, according to admission order, into flu group A (coded no. 3 N-2) group B (coded no. 3 N-1) group C (coded no. 3 N), 80 patients in each group. Group A underwent anal fistula resection with stage I suture and group B received basal decompression anal fistula resection. Group C were subjected to anal fistula resection and half deep suture technique. Statistical analysis of all postoperative information was carried out in the groups of patients.Results The efficacy in Group C was as high as 98.75%, and no sequela, the average postoperative recovery time was shortest 6.5 d, and the scar average width the most narrow is 3.5 mm. Effect in group B was inferior, group A worst.Conclusions The clinical curative effect of anal fistula resection and half deep suture technique for multi-episode patients is the optimal.
娄颍博，金伟森. 多次发作肛瘘三种术式疗效比较[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(6): 606-608.
LOU Yingbo and JIN Weisen. Clinical efficacy of three kinds of surgical treatment for multi-episode anal fistula. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(6): 606-608.
2016, Vol. 27 
