Abstract：Objective To compare the curative effect of thoracoscopic sublobar resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer with that of lobectomy.Methods 210 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled, divided into the lobectomy group (105 patients) and sublobar resection group (105 patients), and followed up for 18 months after operation.Results There was no difference in age, sex, pathological type, stage, diameter or area of tumors between these two groups (P>0.05). The sublobar resection group had shorter hospital stay, smaller blood loss volumes and fewer pulmonary complications (P<0.05)than the lobectomy group. There was no difference in the rate of total recurrence, local recurrence and distant recurrence, cardiac complications, all-cause death or death caused by lung cancer between the two groups. The incidence of pulmonary complications of the sublobar resection group was significantly lower than that of the lobectomy group (P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy, sublobar resection can shorten hospital stay, lower the blood loss volume and reduce pulmonary complications.
林吉兴, 梁朝阳, 王柏霖. Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌两种切除术式效果比较[J]. 武警医学, 2017, 28(9): 909-911.
LING Jixing, LIANG Chaoyang, and WANG Bailin. Curative effect of thoracoscopic sublobar resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer compared with lobectomy. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2017, 28(9): 909-911.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010, 60(5): 277-300.
[2]
Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, et al. Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006, 132(4): 769-775.
[3]
Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Iwasaki A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) segmentectomy for small peripheral lung cancer tumors [J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(11): 1657-1662.
[4]
Alam N, Flores R M. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the evidence base [J]. J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2007, 11(3): 368-374.
[5]
Cattaneo S M, Park B J, Wilton A S, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008, 85(1): 231-235.
[6]
Whitson B A, Andrade R S, Boettcher A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 83(6): 1965-1970.
[7]
Jeon H W, Kim Y D, Kim K S, et al. Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in solid-type, clinical stage IA,non-small cell lung cancer [J]. World J Surg Oncol,2014, 12: 215.
[8]
Mountain C F. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer[J].Chest,1997,111(6):1710-1717.
[9]
Scott W J, Howington J, Feigenberg S, et al. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage Ⅱ: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) [J]. Chest, 2007, 132(3 Suppl): 234S-242S.
[10]
Koike T, Togashi K, Shirato T, et al. Limited resection for noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative pathologic examination [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 88(4): 1106-1111.
[11]
Ginsberg R J, Rubinstein L V. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1995, 60(3): 615-623.
[12]
Wisnivesky J P, Henschke C I, Swanson S, et al. Limited resection for the treatment of patients with stage IA lung cancer [J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 251(3): 550-554.
[13]
Kates M, Swanson S, Wisnivesky J P. Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer < =1 cm in size: a review of SEER data [J]. Chest, 2011, 139(3): 491-496.
[14]
Altorki N K, Yip R, Hanaoka T, et al. Sulobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for clinical stage 1A lung cancer in solid nodules [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(2): 754-762.
2017, Vol. 28 
