Covani U, Ricci M, Bozzolo G, et al. Analysis of the pattern of the alveolar ridge remodeling following single tooth extraction [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(8): 820-825.
[2]
Araújo M G, Silva C O, Misawa M, et al. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn [J]. Periodontol, 2000, 2015, 68(1):122-134.
[3]
Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, et al. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT [J]. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(suppl): 195S-201S.
[4]
Araújo M G, Sukekava F, Wennstrom J L, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(6): 645-652.
Hurzeler M B, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report [J]. J Chin Periodontal, 2010, 37(9): 855-862.
[7]
Han C H, Park K B, Mangano F G. The modified socket shield technique [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(8): 2247-2254.
[8]
Saeidi Pour R, Zuhr O, Hurzeler M, et al. Clinical benefits of the immediate implant socket shield technique [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2017, 29(2): 93-101.
[9]
Arabbi K C, Sharanappa M, Priya Y, et al. Socket shield: a case report [J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2019, 11(Suppl 1): S72-S75.
[10]
Zhang Z, Dong Y, Yang J, et al. Effect of socket-shield technique on alveolar ridge soft and hard tissue in dogs [J]. J Clin Periodontal, 2019, 46(2): 256-263.
[11]
Saravanan V, Ravishankar P L, Malakar M, et al. Socket-shield technique of mandibular anterior teeth: a case report [J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2019, 11(Suppl 2): S495-S498.
[12]
Kan J Y, Runqcharassaenq K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2013, 33(1): e24-e31.
[13]
Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy a case report [J]. Quintessence Int, 2014, 45(1): 23-30.
[14]
Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volume trical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment-a pilot study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(1): 71-82.
[15]
Aslan S. Improved volume and contour stability with thin socket shield preparation in immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone [J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2018, 13(2): 172-183.
[16]
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du T J. Partial extraction therapies (PET) Part 2:procedures and technical aspects [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(3): 377-385.
[17]
Guo T, Nie R, Xin X, et al. Tissue preservation through socket-shield technique and platelet-rich fibrin in immediate implant placement: a case report [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(50): e13175.
[18]
Bramanti E, Norcia A, Cicciu M, et al. Postextraction dental implant in the aesthetic zone, socket shield technique versus conventional protocol [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(4): 1037-1041.
[19]
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(2): 122-129.
[20]
Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement-clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(11): 1450-1458.
[21]
Siormpas K D, Mitsias M E, Kotsakis G A, et al. The root membrane technique: a retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up [J]. Implant Dent, 2018, 27(5): 564-574.
[22]
Guirado J L, Troiano M, Lopez-Lopez P J, et al. Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: an experimental study in dog mandible [J]. Ann Anat, 2016, 208: 109-115.
[23]
Calvo-Guirado J L, Benítez-García J A, Maté Sánchez de Val J E, et al. Socket-shield technique: the influence of the length of the remaining buccal segment of healthy tooth structure on peri-implant bone and socket preservation. A study in dogs [J]. Ann Anat, 2019, 221: 84-92.
[24]
Tan Z, Kang J, Liu W, et al. The effect of the heights and thicknesses of the remaining root segments on buccal bone resorption in the socket-shield technique: an experimental study in dogs [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3): 352-359.
[25]
Schwimer C, Pette G A, Gluckman H, et al. Human histologic evidence of new bone formation and osseointegration between root dentin(unplanned socket-shield)and dental implant: case report [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(1): e19-e23.
[26]
Dayakar M M, Waheed A, Bhat H S, et al. The socket-shield technique and immediate implant placement [J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2018, 22(5): 451-455.
Schwimer C W, Gluckman H, Salama M, et al. The socket-shield technique at molar sites: A proof-of-principle technique report [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(2): 229-233.
[29]
Herd J R. The retained tooth root [J]. Aust Dent J, 1973, 18(3): 125-131.
[30]
Guarnieri R, Giardino L, Crespi R, et al. Cementum formation around a titanium implant: a case report [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(5): 729-732.
2020, Vol. 31 
