Comparision of application effect of a new type of double-lumen endobronchial tube and a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker in lung isolation surgery
YU Yang1, WAN Qiong2, XIE Yanling3, LIANG Shujuan1
1. Department of Anesthesiology,the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City, Qinhuangdao 066000, China; 2. Department of Health Services, 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the application effect of silicone double-lumen endobronchial intubation and polyvinyl chloride(PVC) single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker intubation guided by fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) in lung isolation surgery. Methods One hundred and two patients admitted in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City from Januray 2019 to December 2020 were randomly divided into silicone double-lumen endobronchial tube group (group D,n=51) and PVC single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker group(group B,n=51).Endotracheal intubation and confirmation of proper position were performed in both groups under the guidance of fiberbronchoscope.The time of intubation and fibrobronchoscopy positioning, the incidence of misplacement, the time required for maximum intraoperative lung collapse, the degree of satisfaction of pulmonary atrophy, the difference between arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-expiratory partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PetCO2) after one-lung ventilation, postoperative pharyngeal pain VAS score and the degree of vocal cord injury were recorded in both groups. Results There was no significant difference in the time of intubation, postoperative pharyngeal pain VAS score and the incidence of vocal cord injury between the two groups (P>0.05).The time of fibrobronchoscopy positioning of group D[(26.83±6.71)s] was shorter than that of group B[(49.17±7.14)s], the incidence of misplacement of group D(3.92%) was lower than that of group B(17.65%), the time required for maximum lung collapse of group D[(11±5)s] was shorter than that of group B[(31±17)s],the degree of satisfaction of pulmonary atrophy of group D(90.2%)was better than that of group B(56.9%), and the difference between PaCO2 and PetCO2 after single-lung ventilation was smaller than that of group B, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusions In surgical procedures of single lung isolation, fiber bronchoscope-guided silicone double-lumen bronchial catheter which is less invasive is as quick as bronchial blocking tube, and can achieve better lung isolation effect.
于洋, 万琼, 谢艳玲, 梁淑娟. 新型双腔支气管导管与支气管封堵管在肺隔离手术中的应用效果比较[J]. 武警医学, 2022, 33(5): 373-377.
YU Yang, WAN Qiong, XIE Yanling, LIANG Shujuan. Comparision of application effect of a new type of double-lumen endobronchial tube and a single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker in lung isolation surgery. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2022, 33(5): 373-377.
Abdelazeem A. Double lumen tube: size and insertion depth[J]. Saudi J Anaesth,2021,15(3): 280-282.
[2]
Jeon J, Lee K, Ahn G, et al. Comparison of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness between two types of double-lumen endobronchial tubes: a randomized controlled trial[J].CardiothoracVasc Anesth, 2015,29:121-125.
[3]
Campos J H, Kernstine K H. A comparison of a left-sided Broncho-Cath with the torque control blocker univent and the wireguided blocker[J].Anesth Analg,2003, 96(1): 283-289.
[4]
Yuji Kamimura,Toshiyuki Nakanishi,Aiji Boku Sato, et al.Effects of the anesthesiologist′s experience on postoperative hoarseness after double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a single-center propensity score-matched analysis[J].BMC Anesthesiol,2020,20(1):278.
[5]
Martin B B,Lee M A,Erin J, et al.Laryngeal injury and upper airway symptoms after endotracheal intubation during surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Anesth Analg,2021, 132(4):1023-1032.
Young Y J, Jeong C Y, Yong P S,et al. Time to tracheal intubation over a fibreoptic bronchoscope using a silicone left double-lumen endobronchial tube versus polyvinyl chloride single-lumen tube with bronchial blocker: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019,11(3): 901-908.
[11]
Stephen R C,Brian J T,Javier H C,et al. Lung isolation in the patient with a difficult airway[J]. Anesth Analg,2018, 126(6):1968-1978.
[12]
Taeha R,Eugene K,Jong H K, et al.Comparing the placement of a left-sided double-lumen tube via fiberoptic bronchoscopy guidance versus conventional intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope, to reduce the incidence of malpositioning: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial[J].BMC, 2019, 20(1): 51.
James P,Daniel D S,Ari E, et al. End-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide gradient in serious traumatic brain injury after prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational study[J]. Emerg Med J,2020, 37(11):674-679.
[17]
Savino S,Salvatore G,Dan Stieper K, et al. Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation[J].J Clin Monit Comput, 2021, 35(5):1149-1157.
[18]
Oliver S,Fritz F,Robert S,et al. Transcutaneous PTCCO 2 measurement in combination with arterial blood gas analysis provides superior accuracy and reliability in ICU patients[J].J Clin Monit Comput, 2017, 31(1):153-158.