Abstract：Objective To compare two recovery Methods (active vs.passive) on exercise performance and training effect during sprint interval training in soldiers.Methods Eighteen male soldiers performed 6 sets of sprint interval training (30 s cycling sprints, Wingate test). Each set was followed by 4 min of passive (resting still on the ergometer) or active recovery (pedaling at 1.1 W/kg). Peak power (PP), mean power (MP), fatigue index (FI), total work (TW) and heart rate (HR) were recorded during each Wingate test (not including interval period).Results Compared with passive recovery, active recovery resulted in a lower PP in the 2 nd Wingate test (P<0.05) and a greater MP and HR in the 4~6 th Wingate test (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between FI and TW between the 2 recovery conditions(P>0.05).Conclusion Passive recovery is beneficial when only 2 sprints are completed, whereas active recovery better maintains performance on subsequent Wingate test. When performing sprint interval training, soldiers should select a reasonable recovery method according to training plan to improve the training effect.
彭朋, 何瑞波, 马刚, 秦永生, 薄海, 王大宁. 两种恢复方式对士兵冲刺间歇训练效果的影响[J]. 武警医学, 2022, 33(8): 689-692.
PENG Peng, HE Ruibo, MA Gang, QIN Yongsheng, BO Hai, WANG Daning. Comparison of two recovery methods on training effect during sprint interval training in soldiers. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2022, 33(8): 689-692.
Hostrup M, Gunnarsson T P, Fiorenza M, et al. In-season adaptations to intense intermittent training and sprint interval training in sub-elite football players[J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2019, 29(5): 669-677.
[4]
Kemi O J, Fowler E, Mcglynn K, et al. Intensity-dependence of exercise and active recovery in high-intensity interval training[J]. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2019, 59(12): 1937-1943.
[5]
Wiewelhove T, Schneider C, Schmidt A, et al. Active recovery after high-intensity interval-training does not attenuate training adaptation[J]. Front Physiol, 2018, 9: 415-421.
[6]
Ktenidis C K, Margaritelis N V, Cherouveim E D, et al. Priming exercise increases wingate cycling peak power output[J]. Eur J Sport Sci, 2021, 21(5): 705-713.
[7]
Spierer D K, Goldsmith R, Baran D A, et al. Effects of active vs. passive recovery on work performed during serial supramaximal exercise tests[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2004, 25(2): 109-114.
[8]
Dupont G, Moalla W, Matran R, et al. Effect of short recovery intensities on the performance during two Wingate tests[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2007, 39(7): 1170-1176.
[9]
Del C J, Hamouti N, Aguado J R, et al. Restoration of blood pH between repeated bouts of high-intensity exercise: effects of various active-recovery protocols[J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010,108(3):523-32.
Wallimann T, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U. The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine[J]. Amino Acids, 2011, 40(5): 1271-1296.
[13]
Heskamp L, Lebbink F, van Uden M J, et al. Post-exercise intramuscular O2 supply is tightly coupled with a higher proximal-to-distal ATP synthesis rate in human tibialis anterior[J]. J Physiol, 2021, 599(5): 1533-1550.
[14]
Fujita Y, Koizumi K, Sukeno S, et al. Active recovery effects by previously inactive muscles on 40-s exhaustive cycling[J]. J Sports Sci, 2009, 27(11): 1145-1151.
[15]
Dorado C, Sanchis-Moysi J, Calbet J A. Effects of recovery mode on performance, O2 uptake, and O2 deficit during high-intensity intermittent exercise[J]. Can J Appl Physiol, 2004, 29(3): 227-244.
2022, Vol. 33 
