Abstract：Objective To evaluate the influencing factors of critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods The surgical video data of 304 patients with benign gallbladder diseases admitted to the Department of Surgery of Anhui Provincial Crops Hospital of Chinese People'S Armed Police Force from January 2022 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the implementation criteria of CVS, the patients were divided into CVS group (212 patients), and non-CVS group (92 patients). The differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, bile duct injury(BDI), postoperative biliary leakage, and postoperative hospital stay were compared. At the same time, the factors affecting the implementation of CVS were analyzed by logistic analysis.Results There was significant difference in the operation time between the two groups [(38.25±5.66)mm vs.(45.82±6.63)mm;P<0.05]; the incidence of biliary leakage in CVS group was much lower than that in non-CVS group (0% vs 2.17%). Logistic regression analysis was carried out on the factors influencing the successful implementation of CVS technology in LC surgery. The results showed that moderate/severe cholecystitis, stone incarceration in the neck of gallbladder, thickening of gallbladder wall>5 mm, gallbladder fibrosis and bile duct variation were independent risk factors affecting the implementation of CVS technology in LC.Conclusions The application of CVS technology has certain conditions, and the surgical strategy should be selected flexibly in clinic.
徐飞, 杨柳生, 王文飞, 孙艳军. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中安全性关键术野技术应用的影响因素[J]. 武警医学, 2023, 34(8): 664-667.
XU Fei, YANG Liusheng, WANG Wenfei, SUN Yanjun. Factors influencing the application of critical view of safety technology in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2023, 34(8): 664-667.
Brunt L M, Deziel D J, Telem D A, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state of the art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 272(1):3-23.
[4]
Strasberg S M, Hertl M, Soper N J. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1995, 180(1):101-125.
[5]
Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25(1):41-54.
Halle-Smith J M, Hodson J, Stevens L G, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of the long-term clinical and economic impact of minor bile duct injury[J]. Surgery, 2020, 167(6):942-949.
[8]
Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, et al. One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13(3):498-503.
[9]
Kaya B, Fersahoglu MM, Kilic F, et al. Importance of critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 120 serial patients, with no incidence of complications[J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2017, 21(1):17-20.
Sgaramella LI, Gurrado A, Pasculli A, et al. The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No?An Italian Multicentre study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(7):3698-3708.
[13]
Brunt L M, Deziel D J, Telem D A, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(7):2827-2855.
2023, Vol. 34 
