不同远视力组飞行学员招飞选拔相关指标分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (582 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To evaluate the medical indexes of student pilots by different distant vision classes, and to discover the scientific evidence of revising vision standard to recruit student pilots. Methods A cross-section survey was conducted to the student pilots in some year, and 290 student pilots were classified into 3 groups by different distant vision (0.8, 0.9 and above 1.0), all sampled respondents were interviewed with questionnaire, physical examination, including distant vision, hearing, heart function, pulmonary function, database was established, cleaned and analyzed by EpiData 3.02, SAS 9.13 with double entered checking. Results Different class of student pilots by distant vision have different psychological selection performance record, the group 0.9 lowest (5.40? 0.62), the group above 1.0 highest(5.89?0.62), and the other indexes including entrance examination performance, distant vision, hearing, heart function and pulmonary function were provided, different class of student pilots by distant vision have no differences. Conclusions The vision standard to recruit student pilots should combine the psychological selection performance, and to determine the index of which should carry out prospective study.

Key words： distant vision student pilots pilot selection

Received: 03 April 2014

ZTFLH:

R851.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZOU Zhi-Kang
	LIU Qing-Yuan
	MA Zhong-Li

Cite this article:

ZOU Zhi-Kang,LIU Qing-Yuan,MA Zhong-Li. An evaluation of some index to the different class of student pilots by distant vision[J]. , 2014, 25(2): 136-138.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2014/V25/I2/136

[1]	United States Air Force. AFI 48-123, Medical examinations and standards[S]. Washington: HQ USAF/SG, 2011:23-25.
[2]	王生成,郑巨军. 执行新招飞体检标准,提高飞行学员体检质量[J]. 航空军医,2006,34(1):30-32.
[1]	United States Air Force. AFI 48-123, Medical examinations and standards[S]. Washington: HQ USAF/SG, 2011:23-25.
[2]	王生成,郑巨军. 执行新招飞体检标准,提高飞行学员体检质量[J]. 航空军医,2006,34(1):30-32.
[3]	Paullin C, Katz L C,Kenneth T. et al. Review of aviator selection, ADA455302[R]. Arlington: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences, 2006.
[3]	Paullin C, Katz L C,Kenneth T. et al. Review of aviator selection, ADA455302[R]. Arlington: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences, 2006.
[4]	Jacobina S, Nancy T, Kenneth S, et al. Air force personnel research issues: a manager’s handbook, ADA534240 [R]. Randolph: Air Force Personnel Center - Strategic Research and Analysis Branch, 2007.
[4]	Jacobina S, Nancy T, Kenneth S, et al. Air force personnel research issues: a manager’s handbook, ADA534240 [R]. Randolph: Air Force Personnel Center - Strategic Research and Analysis Branch, 2007.
[5]	Fatolitis P, Jentsch F, Hancock P. Initial validation of novel performance-based measures: mental rotation and psychomotor ability, ADA529481[R]. Pensacola: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. 2010.
[5]	Fatolitis P, Jentsch F, Hancock P. Initial validation of novel performance-based measures: mental rotation and psychomotor ability, ADA529481[R]. Pensacola: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. 2010.
[6]	张霞,马月欣,刘飒,等. 全国第六次航空航天医学学术会议论文摘要[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志,2002,13(2):102.
[6]	张霞,马月欣,刘飒,等. 全国第六次航空航天医学学术会议论文摘要[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志,2002,13(2):102.
[7]	苗丹民,白延强,张其吉,Sternberg 双重任务测验效度检验及文化因素影响分析[J]. 航天医学与医学工程,1998,11(6):439-443.
[7]	苗丹民,白延强,张其吉,Sternberg 双重任务测验效度检验及文化因素影响分析[J]. 航天医学与医学工程,1998,11(6):439-443.