单孔法与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (966 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods From January 2013 to December 2013, 68 patients were recruited and divided into single incision group and three-port group based on the willingness of the patients. Comparative study was condacted on the length of operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, gallbladder removal time, postoperative complication, postoperative eating time, pain scores, postoperative satisfaction, hospital stay and hospitalization expenses. Results Four patients in single incision group were converted to three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The other patients were successfully operated, without conversion to three-port laparoscopic or open surgery. Compared with three-port group ,the assessment indexes in single incision group including intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative eating time were not significantly different, while the transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with a longer operating time (50.7±25.4) minutes versus (25.4±8.5) minutes, less pain (1.2±0.5 versus 2.7±0.6), better cosmetic results (4.4±0.6 versus 3.1±0.8)and less hospitalization expenses (6998.9±489.7 versus 8013.4±229.6)yuan, and the assessment indexes were significantly different(P＜0.05). Conclusions Although the transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a difficult procedure, it is a safe and economical technique with superior cosmetic effect. The feasibility of clinical research is determined by the ability of the surgeon, and patients should be selected carefully.

Key words： laparoscopic cholecystectomy benign gallbladder disease common laparoscopic equipment

Received: 22 April 2015

ZTFLH:

R657.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DAN Zhenyu
	GONG Renhua
	SUN Dengqun
	ZHONG Xinguo
	JIANG Shitao
	ZHENG Duoan
	WANG Tao
	ZHANG Zhou
	and ZHANG Yiming

Cite this article:

DAN Zhenyu,GONG Renhua,SUN Dengqun等. Comparative study of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using common equipment and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2015, 26(11): 1122-1124.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2015/V26/I11/1122

[11]	Romanelli J R, Roshek T B 3ed, Lynn D C, et al. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience [J] . Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(6):1374-1379.
[1]	Wewers M E, Lowe N K. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena[J]. Res Nurs Health,1990, 13(4):227-236.
[12]	但震宇, 龚仁华, 孙登群, 等. 常规器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术34例[J]. 武警医学, 2012, 23(8): 697-698.
[2]	Baird J F, Kiyak H A.The uninformed orthodontic patient and parent: treatment outcomes[J]. AM J Orthod Dentofac, 2003, 124(2):212-215.
[3]	郑民华. NOTES与单孔腹腔镜技术的发展现状与展望[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(1): 18-20.
[4]	张忠涛,郭伟. 单孔腔镜技术发展带给我们的思考[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(1): 29-31.
[5]	孙颖浩. 单孔腹腔镜在泌尿外科的发展现状及展望[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(1): 23-24.
[6]	李栋,周旭坤,李平,等. 经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗结石性胆囊炎的对比分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2012, 12(1): 20-23.
[7]	王蕾蕾,赵振民. 肚脐整形再造的临床应用探讨[J]. 中国美容医学, 2008, 17(1): 149-152.
[8]	Ponsky T A.Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2009, 209(5):e1-e6.
[9]	张显敏,李栋,李平, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前超声评估价值[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2013, 27(5): 4779-4784.
[10]	Rivas H,Varela E, Scott D, et al. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients[J] . Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(6): 1403-1412.
[11]	Romanelli J R, Roshek T B 3ed, Lynn D C, et al. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience [J] . Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(6):1374-1379.
[12]	但震宇, 龚仁华, 孙登群, 等. 常规器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术34例[J]. 武警医学, 2012, 23(8): 697-698.