小儿膀胱结石两种治疗方法的比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (600 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the fifth-generation EMS pneumatic lithotripsy combined with ultrasound adsorption gravel and clearance technology in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones.Methods The clinical data on 27 patients (treatment group) with bladder stones treated with the fifth-generation EMS pneumatic lithotripsy combined with ultrasound adsorption gravel and clearance technology were compared with those on another 25 cases (control) treated with pneumatic lithotripsy under a transurethral ureteroscope.Results In the treatment group, the gravel stone extraction time was (15±3) min, average operative time (20±10) min, and postoperative hospital stay (6±1) days. There was no urethral injury or residual stones. In control group, the stone extraction time was (40±6) min, mean operative time (45±15) min, and postoperative hospital stay (9±2) days. Four of the patients suffered from urethral injury, six from residual stones, and three received a second surgery .There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusions The ultrasound guided fifth- generation minimally invasive percutaneous EMS pneumatic lithotripsy combined with ultrasound adsorption gravel and clearance technology is suitable for treatment of pediatric bladder stones. This approach has the advantages of minimal invasion, high efficiency, safety, reliability, simple operation, short operation, no stone residuals , quick recovery and no urethral injuries. It is superior to transurethral surgery and should be used more widely.

Key words： minimally invasive percutaneous pneumatic lithotripsy technology ultrasonic lithotripsy pediatric bladder stones

Received: 08 January 2016

ZTFLH:

R694.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YUAN Chaoying
	YAN Dong
	HUANG Suxi
	YUAN Jie
	HAI Lati
	XIAO Huaping
	and ZHOU Haihui

Cite this article:

YUAN Chaoying,YAN Dong,HUANG Suxi等. Ultrasound guided minimally invasive percutaneous lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric bladder stones[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(10): 1006-1008.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2016/V27/I10/1006

[1]	吴阶平.吴阶平泌尿外科学[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004:785-786.
[2]	叶章群,邓耀良,蕫诚,等.泌尿系结石[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:261-270.
[3]	高艳芳.尿路结石症发病危险因素的研究进展[J].重庆医学,2011,40(18):1847-1849.
[4]	吴在德,吴肇汉.外科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:685-686.
[5]	谷現恩.尿石症的诊断与治疗[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:268-269.
[6]	Murat M,AlimT,Eniwer Y,et al .Clinical analysisof upper urinarytract calculi in children of 286 patients[J].Clin Urol,2007,22(4):280‐282.
[7]	凯赛尔.阿吉,乃比江.毛拉库尔班.维生素D受体基因TOKI位点多态性与维吾尔族小儿尿路结石的关系[J].新疆医科大学学报,2013,36(6):777-779.
[8]	郭应禄.腔内泌尿外科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2013:171-175.
[9]	邹晓峰,黄明,单炽昌,等.经腔镜气压弹道碎石术治疗小儿尿路结石17例报告[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2002,23 (12):724-725.
[10]	邹晓峰,黄明,袁源湖,等.经腔镜气压弹道碎石术治疗泌尿系结石(附356例报告)[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志,2008,26 (10):6-7.
[11]	殷易钰,朱孝宇,张宏伟,等.腹腔镜气膀胱手术在婴幼儿原发性膀胱结石中的应用[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2012,17(9):709-711.
[12]	方亮,李炯明,刘建和,等.微通道经皮膀胱取石术治疗小儿膀胱结石(附16例报告)[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(4):119-121.
[13]	焦湘,张雪培.经皮肾镜联合EMS第5代超声负压吸引联合气压弹道碎石清石治疗复杂性肾结石136例疗效分析[J].临床医学杂志,2014,31(5):56-58.
[14]	李建兴,牛亦农,田溪泉,等.经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术的安全性和疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,7(86):1975-1977.
[15]	Salah M A,Holman E, oth C. Percutaneous suprnpubic cys tolithotripsy for pediatric bladder stones ina developing country[J].Eur Urol,2001,39(3):466- 470.