两种微创手术治疗较大膀胱结石的疗效比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (517 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect of two different minimally invasive surgical treatments for patients with larger bladder stones (diameter 2.5 cm or above), and to explore the advantages of minimally invasive percutaneous transurethral cystostomy in the treatment of larger bladder stones.Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with bladder stones (above 2.5 cm in diameter) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment, 40 patients were divided into the percutaneous group and transurethral group respectively.<<< In the percutaneous group, percutaneous cystostomy combined with pneumatic lithotripsy was used while in the transurethral group, transurethral pneumaticlithotripsy was performed. The clinical efficacy was compared and analyzed between the two groups>>>.Results The percutaneous group was superior to the transurethral group in terms of operation time, catheterization time and voiding time. The amount of bleeding loss was smaller in the percutaneous group than in the transurethral group (P<0.01). The first-stage stone clearance rate was 97.5% in the percutaneous group and 85% in the transurethral group. The total effective rate was 92.5% in the transcutaneous group (P<0.05), higher than in the transurethral group (P<0.05).Conclusions Percutaneous pneumatic lithotripsy is more effective for the treatment of bladder stones with a diameter of 2.5 cm or above than transurethral pneumatic lithotripsy, and this method is worthy of popularization and application in clinical practice.

Key words： micro-channel percutaneous cystostomy bladder stones

Received: 01 December 2016

ZTFLH:

R694.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHEN Xuecheng
	XIONG Zhaohui
	ZHAO Benlong
	LI Qing
	and PAN Jinsheng

Cite this article:

SHEN Xuecheng,XIONG Zhaohui,ZHAO Benlong等. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgical treatments for large bladder stone[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2017, 28(5): 472-474.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2017/V28/I5/472

[1]	吴石萍,王小勇,赖炳旺,等.微创经皮膀胱取石术治疗膀胱结石86例报告[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(2):17-19.
[2]	Gu S P, You Z Y, Huang Y, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous cystostomy with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for calculus in bladder diverticula [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013, 5(6): 1627-1630.
[3]	Kumar A, Dalela D, Dalela D, et al. The twin amplatz sheath method: a modified technique of percutaneous cystolithotripsy for large bladder stones in female patients [J]. J Surg Tech Case Rep, 2013, 5(2): 109-111.
[4]	Khosa A S, Hussain M, Hussain M. Safety and efficacy of transurethral pneumatic lithotripsy for bladder calculi in children [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2012, 62(12): 1297-1300.
[5]	叶章群,邓耀良,董诚.泌尿系结石[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:326-327.
[6]	孙颖浩,王芝芳,王林辉,等. 气压弹道治疗泌尿系结石(附155 例报告)[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2001,22(11):50-52.
[7]	Papatsoris A G, Varkarakis I, Dellis A, et al. Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy [J]. Urol Res, 2006, 34(3): 163-167.
[8]	魏森鑫,蔡宪安,王继征,等. 经尿道超声联合气压弹道治疗膀胱结石30 例临床分析[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2013,12 (3):224-225.
[9]	余志海,鲁鹏,夏宗禹,等. 经尿道电切镜鞘配合超声气压弹道联合碎石治疗多发性膀胱结石(附46例报告)[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2013, 15(5):715-716.
[10]	Tan Y K, Gupta D M, Weinberg A, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous management of large bladder stones with a laparoscopic entrapment bag [J]. J Endourol, 2014,28(1):61-64.
[11]	Ciftci H, Gumus K, Demir M, et al. Endoscopic cystolithotomy by mini nephroscope: a preliminary study [J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2015, 24(2):114-118.
[12]	Bansal A, Kumar M, Sankhwar S, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of three endoscopic modalities used in treatment of bladder stones [J]. Urologia, 2016,83(2):87-92.