|
|
Short-term effect of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for elder gastric cancer patients in progressive stage |
WANG Dixiang1, WANG Jiaxing2, LI Jie2, ZHAO Zhenzhong2 |
1.Department of Emergency, 2.Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Panzhihua Iron and Steel Group,Panzhihua 617023,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the short-term effect of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy(LADG)for elder gastric cancer patients at the progressive stage.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients with gastric cancer who had undergone LADG and another 128 patients treated with traditional open abdominal surgery were compared in terms of intraoperative and postoperative indexes, leukocyte count, C reactive protein, plasma motilin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and somatostatin.Results The amount of intraoperative bleeding, size of surgical incision, and the first anus exhaust time in the laparoscopy group were significantly smaller or earlier than those in the laparotomy group(P<0.05). WBC and CRP values of the two groups changed with time (P<0.05), and were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the laparotomy group (P<0.05) at different stages. The interactions between different surgical methods and time had effect on the values of WBC and CRP (P<0.05). The plasma motilin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and somatostatin in the two groups changed with time (P<0.05). The values of plasma motilin in the laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the laparotomy group at different stages, while the values of vasoactive intestinal peptide and somatostatin were significantly lower (P<0.05). The interactions between surgical approaches and time had some effect on plasma motilin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and somatostatin (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, P>0.05.Conclusions LADG has obvious advantages in reducing the amount of bleeding, surgical incision, hospital stay and inflammatory responses, and in promoting the recovery of gastrointestinal function.
|
Received: 10 June 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李志祥. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎, 胆结石的疗效比较[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2015, 24(4): 422-424.
|
[2] |
孙钦立, 张晓明, 周忠晋, 等. 腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术的临床对比研究[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2009, 12(7): 605-607.
|
[3] |
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2016版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(9):851-857.
|
[4] |
郑朝旭, 郑荣寿, 张思维,等. 中国2010年胃癌发病与死亡分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2014, 23(10):795-800.
|
[5] |
连郁雯, 蔡元华, 李 丹,等. 福建省仙游县胃癌环境危险因素及其交互作用:基于病例对照研究[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2017, 34(1):37-41.
|
[6] |
郑 月, 王良梅. 不同压力CO2气腹对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后患者膈下疼痛的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(17):72-74.
|
[7] |
覃正文, 郑会贤, 任 郁. 腹腔镜与开腹卵巢囊肿剥除术对机体免疫功能及术后近远期卵巢功能的影响[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2016, 22(1):55-58.
|
[8] |
崔 勇,程树杰,张燕北,等. 腹腔镜辅助与开腹全结肠系膜切除术治疗老年人右半结肠癌疗效和安全性的比较[J]. 武警医学, 2017, 28(11): 1100-1103.
|
[9] |
余佩武, 钱 锋, 郝迎学,等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术726例的疗效分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10(1):44-47.
|
[10] |
Kim S M, Ha M H, Seo J E, et al. Comparison of reduced port totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet TLDG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(8): 2567-2572.
|
[11] |
乐海浪, 罗国强. 创伤后早期炎症因子TNF-α、lL-1、lL-6的研究进展[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2014(4):763-765.
|
[12] |
Chen K, Mou Y P, Xu X W, et al. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a 10-y single-center experience with meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Res, 2015, 194(2): 367-374.
|
[13] |
王 竞, 杨汉良, 章未央,等. 腹腔镜与开腹根治术术后直肠癌患者感染率及对炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(1):140-142.
|
[14] |
Lee J H, Nam B H, Ryu K W, et al. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Brit J Surg, 2015, 102(12): 1500-1505.
|
[15] |
陈 军, 何 平, 赵长勇,等. 针灸治疗术后胃瘫综合征疗效及对胃泌素和胃动素的影响[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2016, 35(9):1083-1086.
|
[16] |
吴演清, 钟文毅, 郭国城. 腹腔镜下胃肠溃疡穿孔修补术对患者胃肠动力恢复及血中MTL、VIP的影响[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(11):93-94.
|
[1] |
. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 709-710. |
|
|
|
|