宫腔粘连两种手术方式疗效比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (796 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy and reproductive differences between hysteroscopy(referred to as the cold 1oop) and energy equipment hysteroscopy(referred to as the electric loop) in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions.Methods The 92 patients who received surgery between January 2015 and December 2016 in the Department of Gynecology of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of TCM were divided into two groups. Cold loop adhesiolysis was performed in 42 patients, while the other 50 patients received electric loop adhesiolysis. Data was collected mainly to compare the fertility results of patients in the first year after operation. These two approaches were adopted to restore the menstrual pattern and the effect and endometrial thickness were observed 3 months after surgery.Results Three months after operation, the total effective rate of the cold loop group was 88.1% and better restoration of the menstrual pattern was achieved than in the electric loop group (76.0%). Endometrial thickness and menstrual rates were improved, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant.There was, however, no significant difference in fertility outcomes between the two groups within one year after surgery.Conclusions Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with the cold loop can be used to improve the therapeutic effect after hysteroscopic electric resection.

Key words： intrauterine adhesions hysteroscopy with the electric loop hysteroscopy with the cold loop effect

Received: 19 November 2018

ZTFLH:

R711.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TANG Hong
	LI Xiaomao
	and HU Xiangdan

Cite this article:

TANG Hong,LI Xiaomao,and HU Xiangdan. Clinical observation of effect of mechanical hysteroscopy in intrauterine adhesions[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(10): 877-880.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2019/V30/I10/877

[1]	中华医学会妇产科学分会. 宫腔粘连临床诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2015,50:881-887.
[2]	Khan Z,Goldberg J M.Hysteroscopic management of asherman’s syndrome[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2018,25(2):218-228.
[3]	Xiao S,Wan Y,Xue M,et al.Etiology,treatment,and reproductive prognosis of women with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2014,125(2):121-124.
[4]	Bougie O,Lortie K,Chen I,et al.Treatment of asherman’s syndrome in an outpatient hysteroscopy setting[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2015,22(6S):S122.
[5]	Healy M W,Schexnayder B, Connell M T,et al.Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016,215(3):267-275,e7.
[6]	Cararach M,Penella J, Ubeda A,et al.Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope[J]. Hum Reprod,1994,9(1):87-89.
[7]	Thomson A J,Abbott J A,Kingston A,et al. Fluoroscopically guided synechiolysis for patients with Asherman’s syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes[J]. Fertil Steril,2007,87(2):405-410.
[8]	Mazzon I,Favilli A, Cocco P,et al. Does cold loop hysteroscopic myomectomy reduce intrauterine adhesions? A retrospective study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014,101(1):294-298.e3.
[9]	毛巧玲,佐满珍,周全.联合水囊及壳聚糖的综合方法治疗宫腔粘连的临床效果[J].实用医学杂志,2016,32(21):3551-3554.
[10]	黄莉,施江平,蒋珺瑛. 宫腔镜下手术治疗宫腔粘连的临床疗效观察及宫腔粘连的相关危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(23):3857-3859.