|
|
|
| Clinical characteristics and prognosis of neonatal sepsis |
| WU Qiai, HUANG Yong, WEI Tingyan, CHEN Yusen |
| Department of Neonates,Longhua District People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518109,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of neonatal sepsis and determinants of prognosis. Methods One hundred and forty-seven cases of neonatal sepsis treated at Shenzhen Longhua District People’s Hospital between January 2016 and June 2018 were selected, whose blood specimens were collected to isolate and identify pathogenic bacteria. The clinical manifestations and characteristics of pathogenic bacteria of neonatal sepsis were analyzed, and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of children with neonatal sepsis were analyzed by multifactorial analysis. Results The clinical manifestations of 147 cases of neonatal sepsis were mainly poor response, pallor and dyspnea. A total of 106 strains of pathogenic bacteria were cultured in 147 cases, 59 of which were gram-negative bacteria and 43 were gram-positive bacteria. All the children were treated empirically with antimicrobial drugs according to the relevant infection indexes and blood culture. Children were divided into the surviving group (n=109) and dead group (n=38). Univariate analysis showed that gender, age, mental status, blood pressure, urine outputs and WBC were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the difference in the incidence low-birth-weight infants, preterm infants, MODS, PLT and shock scores was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that MODS (OR:1.532, 95% CI: 1.089-2.109), PLT (OR:2.115, 95% CI: 1.481-2.897) and shock scores (OR:1.809, 95% CI: 1.276-2.468) were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of children with neonatal sepsis. Conclusions The clinical manifestations of neonatal sepsis are mostly poor response, pallor and dyspnea. The cultured pathogens are mainly gram-negative bacteria. MODS, PLT and shock scores are risk factors affecting the prognosis of neonates.
|
|
Received: 20 March 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
陆忠星, 顾月琴. 新生儿败血症的辅助实验室检查[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(3):474-477.
|
| [2] |
Savioli K,Rouse C, Susi A, et al. Suspected or known neonatal sepsis and neurodevelopmental delay by 5 years[J]. J Perinatol, 2018, 38(11):1573-1580.
|
| [3] |
韩晋丽, 张小莉, 王艳芬,等. 早产儿及足月儿新生儿败血症临床特征比较分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(6):1199-1201.
|
| [4] |
Ahmad A M, Ahmed Z, Khushdil A, et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in neonatal sepsis with leukopenia: A prospective cohort study [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2018, 68(11):1613-1617.
|
| [5] |
雷克竞, 唐国红, 姚开虎. 38例足月与早产新生儿败血症临床特点及病原学比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(5): 742-746.
|
| [6] |
中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会感染专业委员会.新生儿败血症诊断及治疗专家共识(2019年版)[J].中华儿科杂志,2019,57(4):252-257.
|
| [7] |
叶应妩, 王毓三, 申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 3版.南京:东南大学出版社, 2006:10-17.
|
| [8] |
Khattab A A, EI-Mekkawy M S, Helwa M A, et al. Utility of serum resistin in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and prediction of disease severity in term and late preterm infants[J]. J Perinat Med, 2018, 46(8):919-925.
|
| [9] |
Marando R, Seni J, Mirambo M M, et al. Predictors of the extended-spectrum-beta lactamases producing Enterobacteriaceae neonatal sepsis at a tertiary hospital, Tanzania[J]. Int J Med Microbiol, 2018, 308(7):803-811.
|
| [10] |
黄丽娇, 庄 晖, 刘丽明. 联合检测PCT、IL-6和CRP水平在预测未足月胎膜早破患者并发绒毛膜羊膜炎及新生儿败血症的临床价值研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(17): 3471-3474.
|
| [11] |
李清红, 何阿玲, 杨军兰,等. 新生儿败血症早产儿与足月儿的临床特点分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(7): 765-767.
|
| [12] |
贾忠兰, 毕福玲, 张彩明. 新生儿败血症病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(1):197-200.
|
| [13] |
刘 瑜, 王琍琍, 曹秀菁. 新生儿败血症病原菌及其耐药性六年的变迁[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2016, 15(8):537-541.
|
| [14] |
徐 艳, 由 军, 毛春梅,等. 新生儿败血症的临床特征、病原菌分布及耐药特点分析[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报, 2016, 50(2):156-158.
|
| [15] |
吴文旭, 梁艺耀, 林 捷,等. 万古霉素对新生儿败血症患儿免疫功能及预后的影响[J]. 泰山医学院学报, 2017, 38(2):195-196.
|
| [16] |
高新颖, 黄立新, 胡建山. 新生儿败血症病原菌耐药性分析及C-反应蛋白与降钙素测定对预后的评估意义[J]. 河北医药, 2016, 38(11):1723-1725.
|
| [17] |
魏亚红. 影响新生儿败血症预后的高危因素分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2017, 5(13):117-118.
|
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 32 
