Haraguchi Ⅰ型后踝骨折不同术式疗效对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (702 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of posterior direct open reduction with posterior anterior screw internal fixation and indirect closed reduction with anterior posterior screw fixation in the treatment of Haraguchi type Ⅰ posterior malleolus fractures. Methods The clinical data on patients with Haraguchi type Ⅰ ankle fractures who had undergone surgery in Jiangsu Corps Hospital of People's Armed Police Force between October 2015 and October 2018 was collected. According to surgical methods, these patients were divided into the posterior direct open reduction group (n=41) and the indirect closed reduction group (n=38). The difference in efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss or postoperative complications between the two groups. Fluoroscopy was used more frequently in the indirect closed reduction group (8.95±0.81) than in the direct open reduction group (6.63±0.74), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). According to postoperative X-ray examination, 30 cases were excellent in the direct open reduction group, and the excellent rate was 73.17%, compared with 12 cases and 31.58% in the indirect closed reduction group. The reduction quality in the direct open reduction group was significantly better than in the closed reduction group (P<0.05). After one year, fractures of patients in the two groups healed completely. After two years, the AOFA score of the direct open reduction group (87.76±2.50) was significantly higher than that of the indirect closed reduction group (82.03±3.04). Conclusions Direct posterolateral open reduction with posterior and anterior screws can achieve better reduction and fixation of Haraguchi type Ⅰ posterior malleolus fractures and better ankle function than closed reduction with anterior and posterior screws.

Key words： posterior malleolus fractures direct open reduction indirect closed reduction cannulated compression screws

Received: 20 March 2021

ZTFLH:

R274.12

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Le
	LIANG Zhikong
	PEI Shouke
	LI Liang
	HU Fangyong
	WANG Changfeng

Cite this article:

YANG Le,LIANG Zhikong,PEI Shouke等. Comparison of curative effects of different surgical approaches to Haraguchi type I posterior malleolus fractures[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2021, 32(12): 1013-1016.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2021/V32/I12/1013

[1]	Court-Brown C M,McBirnie J,Wilson G.Adult ankle fractures-an increasing problem?[J]. Acta Orthop Scand,1998,69(1):43-47.
[2]	Irwin T A,Lien J,Kadakia A R.Posterior malleolus fracture[J].J Am Acad 0rthop Surg,2013,21(1):32-40.
[3]	Tejwani N C, Pahk B, Egol K A. Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on outcome after unstable ankle fracture[J]. J Trauma, 2010, 69(3): 666-669.
[4]	Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, et al. Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(5): 1085-1092.
[5]	龚晓峰,武勇,吕艳伟,等. 后踝骨折手术治疗的指征[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(3):232-2373.
[6]	廖明新,王岩,孙宁,等. 踝关节骨折中后踝骨折的发生率及手术固定的相关因素分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2019(7):575-580.
[7]	曹光磊, 沈惠良, 胡海量,等. 经皮微创空心钉内固定治疗后踝骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2008,10(4):329-333.
[8]	Wang L, Shi Z M, Zhang C Q, et al.Trimalleolar fracture with involvement of the entireposterior plafond[J].Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32 (8): 774-781.
[9]	王建卫,黄路,章相锋. 成人后踝骨折夹层骨块的特征[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2019,39(5):291-297.
[10]	Bartonícek J, Rammelt S, Kostlivy K, et al. Anatomy and classifification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(4): 505-516.
[11]	Faisal S, Zheng X D, Pan Z J, et al. Characteristics of intercalary fragment in posterior malleolus fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 26(3): 289-294.
[12]	Buchler L, Tannast M, Bonel H M, et al. Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fracture[J] . J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(3): 208-212.
[13]	黄杰,施宏飞,熊进,等. 后踝骨折关节面塌陷X线片与CT图像的准确性研究[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2020,36 (4): 332-334.
[14]	Hoogendoorn J M. Posterior malleolar open reduction and internal fixation through a posterolateral approach for trimalleolar fracture[J]. JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 2017, 7(4): e31.
[15]	赵宏谋,梁晓军,李毅,等. 后踝骨折复位程度对胫距关节接触情况的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2014, 30(10):1035-1039.
[16]	Stephan M P, Robert F, Markus H, et al. Lag screws//Rüedi TP, Murphy WM, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management [M]. New York: Thieme, 2000.
[17]	Anwar A, Zhang Z, Lv D, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of AP, PA lag screws and posteriorplating for fixation of posterior malleolar fractures: a threedimensional finite element study [J]. BMC, 2018, 19(1): 73.
[18]	von Rüden C, Hackl S, Woltmann A, et al. The postero-lateral approach--an alternative to closed anterior-posterior screw fixation of a dislocated postero-lateral fragment of the distal tibia in complex ankle fractures[J].Z Orthop Unfall,2015,153(3):289-295.
[19]	Shi H F, Xiong J, Chen Y X, et al. Comparison of the direct and in- direct reduction techniques during the surgical management of posterior malleolar fractures [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2017, 18(1):109.
[20]	Vidovic D, Elabjer E, Muskardin I V A, et al. Posterior fragment in ankle fractures: anteroposterior vs posteroanterior fixation[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(Suppl 5): S65-S69.