经皮冠状动脉介入术中并发冠脉穿孔的危险因素

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (655 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the risk factors for coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods The clinical data on patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the Department of Cardiology of Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2011 and September 2020 was consecutively collected. These patients were grouped according to the occurrence of coronary perforation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for complications with coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Results A total 57 580 patients were enrolled in the final statistical analysis, 90 cases of whom were complicated with coronary perforation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age above 70(OR=2.69, 95% CI:2.25-3.13), femininity(OR=1.46, 95% CI:1.05-1.87), diabetic history(OR=3.05, 95% CI:2.11-3.99), type C lesions(OR=3.69, 95% CI:3.02-4.36), complete occlusion lesions(OR=4.52,95% CI:3.88-5.16), calcification(OR=1.52, 95% CI:1.17-1.87), hydrophilic guide wire and rotablation (OR=10.4, 95% CI:8.87-11.93) were correlated with the incidence of coronary perforation. Conclusions Age above 70, femininity, a history of diabetes mellitus, type C lesions, complete occlusion lesions, calcification, hydrophilic guide wire and rotablation are independent risk factors for the incidence of coronary perforation in patients under percutaneous coronary intervention.

Key words： percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery perforation risk factors

Received: 08 July 2021

ZTFLH:

R541.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Si
	WANG Jingjing
	HOU Xiaoling
	WANG Jinda

Cite this article:

CHEN Si,WANG Jingjing,HOU Xiaoling等. Risk factors for coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2022, 33(1): 60-63.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2022/V33/I1/60

[1]	Youn Y J, Khalid S, Azrin M, et al. Defining coronary artery perforation with ultrasound contrast agent [J]. Korean Circ J, 2018, 48(11): 1028-1029.
[2]	Sandoval Y, Brilakis E S. Preventing and treating coronary perforations: lessons from disaster management [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 89(6): 973-975.
[3]	Nairooz R, Parzynski C S, Curtis J P, et al. Contemporary trends, predictors and outcomes of perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention (From the NCDR Cath PCI Registry) [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2020, 130: 37-45.
[4]	Abdalwahab A,Farag M, Brilakis E S, et al. Management of coronary artery perforation [J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2021, 26: 55-60.
[5]	Nawale J M,Chaurasia A S,Borikar N A, et al. Single center 7 year experience of coronary artery perforation: angiographic and procedural characteristics, management and outcome[J]. Heart Views, 2019, 20(3): 93-100.
[6]	Krishnegowda C,Puttegowda B,Krishnappa S, et al. Incidence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation at a high volume cardiac care center during percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Indian Heart J, 2020, 72(4): 232-238.
[7]	Cerrato E, Pavani M, Barbero U,et al. Incidence, management, immediate and long-term outcome of guidewire and device related grade Ⅲ coronary perforations (from G3CAP-Cardiogroup VI Registry) [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2021, 143: 37-45.
[8]	May A, Bhagwandeen R, Collins N. Contemporary management of coronary artery perforation [J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2019, 28(10): e121-e125.
[9]	Jbeli A H, Sethi P, Kelly S, et al. Coronary artery perforation spilling into right ventricle: a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. S D Med, 2018, 71(10): 466-468.
[10]	Roy P, De Labriolle A, Hanna N,et al. Management of guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation using autologous fat particles versus coil embolization [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 89(2): 253-258.
[11]	Youn Y J, Khalid S, Azrin M, et al. Defining coronary artery perforation with ultrasound contrast agent [J]. Korean Circ J, 2018, 48(11): 1028-1029.
[12]	Coloma Araniya R, Beas R, Maticorena-Quevedo J, et al. Successful management of grade III coronary perforation after percutaneous angioplasty in a high-risk patient: a case report [J]. Medwave, 2016, 16(2): e6395.
[13]	Azzalini L, Poletti E, Ayoub M, et al. Coronary artery perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: epidemiology, mechanisms, management, and outcomes [J]. Euro Intervention, 2019, 15(9): e804-e811.
[14]	Shaukat A, Tajti P, Sandoval Y, et al. Incidence, predictors, management and outcomes of coronary perforations [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2019, 93(1): 48-56.
[15]	Kinoshita E, Kawahito K, Muraoka A, et al. Coronary artery perforation secondary to primary percutaneous coronary intervention; report of a case [J]. Kyobu Geka, 2017, 70(13): 1121-1124.
[16]	Qin Q, Chang S, Xu R, et al. Short and long-term outcomes of coronary perforation managed by coil embolization: a single-center experience [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2020, 298: 18-21.