Argus软件与人工法测量3.0T MRI扫描距骨坏死体积的比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1465 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the numerical difference between the Argus software and artificial method for quantitative measurement of talar necrosis volume separately after 3.0 T magnetic resonance scanning, for the purpose of early diagnosis and evaluation of disease of joint disease with less time and provide a relatively fixed standard quantitative measurement technique. Methods From June 2012 to March 2014, 30 patients with ankle pain were recruited for this study. Using 3.0T MRI scanner, analysis was made of lesion size, shape, boundary and magnetic signal respectively by the artificial method and using the Argus software by professional radiology doctors and the volume of talus necrosis was obtained. The difference of the two methods of quantitative determination of necrosis talus volume was compared. Results The results of artificial method and Argus of talar necrosis volume were (689.32±29.46) mm³ and (671.66±23.01) mm³, respectively, with statistically significant difference (t=1.164, P=0.155). And the time required were (37.8±4.9) min and (10.5±3.1) min, respectively, the comparison between the two methods had significant difference. Argus used significantly less time than the artificial method, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with artificial measurement, Argus software semi-automatic measurement of talar necrosis volume has the advantages of time saving, good repeatability, intuitiveness, and human error small, worthy of clinical practice.

Key words： magnatic resonance imaging necrosis of talus Argus software artificial method

Received: 13 October 2014

ZTFLH:

R445.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DONG Yuru
	WANG Hong
	YANG Jun
	FENG Hu
	YIN Yuanyuan

Cite this article:

DONG Yuru,WANG Hong,YANG Jun等. Comparative study of Argus software and artificial method for quantitative measurement of volume of necrotic talus after 3.0T MRI scans[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2015, 26(3): 241-243.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2015/V26/I3/241

[1]	Golano P, Vega J,Peter A,et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2010,18: 557-569.
[2]	雷新玮,展影,屈瑾, 等. 非创伤性股骨头缺血性坏死塌陷预测的MRI研究 [J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2013, 47(6): 529-533.
[3]	Goebel J C, Pinzano A, Grenier D, et al. New trends in MRI carlilage: advances and limitations in small animal studies[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2010, 20(3): 189-194.
[4]	John J, Herman S, Ginai A Z, et al. The additional value of an oblique image plane for MRI of the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2011, 40: 75-83.
[5]	魏民, 刘玉杰, 李众利, 等. 距骨软骨损伤MRI表现与关节镜检查对照研究[J]. 军医进修学院学报, 2012, 33(11): 1121-1122.
[6]	Sahin B, Ergur H. Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: a stereological gold standard study [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2006, 57(1): 96-101.
[7]	穆学涛, 王宏, 吴春楠, 等. Argus和手工测量法对活体肝移植供体术后肝体积测量的对比研究[J].医疗卫生装备,2012, 33(1): 70-72.
[8]	马聪, 张礼荣, 尉传社, 等. 3.0T MR半自动软件软骨体积定量测量的可重复性及准确性[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2010, 26(4): 760-763.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(5): 452-454.