妊娠晚期B族链球菌感染对妊娠结局的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (585 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of group B streptococcal infection on pregnancy outcome in late pregnancy.Methods The data of 1455 cases of pregnant women in our hospital were collected from 2017-11 to 2018-03.GBS test was performed at 35~37 weeks of pregnancy, it was divided into GBS positive group and GBS negative group according to whether that GBS infection occurred. The GBS positive group was divided into treatment group A (oral antibiotic 7 days at 35-37weeks,except for conventional treatment at birth or after premature rupture of membranes) and treatment group B (routine treatment at birth or after premature rupture of membranes) according to the different treatment methods.Pregnancy outcomes were compared between treatment groups A and B, GBS positive group and GBS negative group.Results (1)The positive rate of GBS was 7.9% (115/1455) in 1455 pregnant women;(2)The incidence rates of premature rupture of membranes, premature delivery, intrauterine infection, cesarean delivery, amniotic fluid turbidity, postpartum hemorrhage, pneumonia of newborn, and neonatal infections in the GBS positive group were statistically significantly higher than those in the GBS negative group (P<0.05); (3)There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment group A and the treatment group B in the all observation indicators.Conclusions GBS infection will easily result in premature rupture of membranes and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. In order to avoid overuse of antibiotics, prophylactic treatment for streptococcus B carriers should be carried out at the time of labor or premature rupture of membranes, so as to achieve satisfactory infection control effect.

Key words： GBS infection in late pregnancy pregnancy outcome

Received: 12 June 2018

ZTFLH:

R714.251

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	GAO Fei
	WANG Yahui
	ZHANG Minjie
	ZHAO Xia
	and ZHANG Xue

Cite this article:

GAO Fei,WANG Yahui,ZHANG Minjie等. Effect of group B streptococcal infection on pregnancy outcomes in late pregnancy[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2018, 29(12): 1141-1143.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2018/V29/I12/1141

[1]	仝净净, 姚开虎, 杨永弘. 新生儿B族链球菌感染预防策略的研究进展[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2014, 16(10): 1075-1080.
[2]	应豪, 孟珍妮. 围产期B族链球菌感染筛查与诊治[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2016, 32(6): 520-522.
[3]	陈翠辉, 白淑秋, 李世玉,等. 规范化安全质量管理模式在产科中的应用效果观察[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2016, 22(22):109-111.
[4]	Teatero S, Ferrieri P, Martin I, et al. Serotype distribution, population structure, and antimicrobial resistance of group B streptococcus strains recovered from colonized pregnant women[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2017, 55(2): 412-422.
[5]	Egle B, Arnoldas B, Rasa T, et al. Prevalence of maternal group B streptococcal colonisation in European countries[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2008, 87(3): 260-271.
[6]	Park J S, Cho D H, Yang J H, et al. Usefulness of arapid real-time PCR assay in prenatal screening for group B streptococcus colonization [J]. Ann Lab Med, 2013, 33(1): 39-44.
[7]	Lu B, Li D, Cui Y, et al. Epidemiology of Group B streptococcus isolated from pregnant women in Beijing, China [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014, 20(6): 370-373.
[8]	黄晓玲,何艳君,林云霞. 中山市妊娠晚期妇女B族链球菌带菌情况调查[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(17): 2905-2906.
[9]	孙丹华, 王李利, 张磊, 等. 妊娠35～37周孕妇B族链球菌与妊娠结局[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2013, 14(4): 312-314.
[10]	张聪颖, 汪洁, 刘晓芳, 等. 妊娠晚期生殖道B 族链球菌感染对妊娠结局的影响探讨[J]. 中国性科学, 2017, 26(2): 116-119.
[11]	谭玉杰,海巨珺,王颢,等. 妊娠晚期孕妇生殖道 B 族链球菌感染对母婴预后的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 22(18): 4279-4281.
[12]	熊丽丽,田晓予,郭凤仙. 妊娠晚期孕妇B族溶血性链球菌感染对妊娠结局影响的临床研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(23): 5482-5484.
[13]	张莹,孙晖,王英,等. 抗感染干预对孕妇生殖道 B族链球菌感染胎膜早破的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27 (1): 179-181, 211.