|
|
|
| Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT with HRCT in differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules |
| LI Yun1,LIU Lifen1,XU Yanhui2,SHI Wenjie1,ZHAI Huina1. |
1.Department of Nuclear Medicine,the Second Hospital of Beijing Municipal Corps,Chinese People’s Armed Police Force,Beijing 100037,China;
2.Department of Radiology,Jiangong Hospital of Beijing 100054,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG position emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) combined with high-resolution CT(HRCT) for differentiating solitary pulmonary nodules(SPNs).Methods The clinical data on 124 patients with SPNs was retrospectively analyzed. All these patients underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT,and 76 of them were also subjected to HRCT. Each of these cases was confirmed pathologically or by clinical follow-up.Differential diagnosis of SPNs was made using morphological features in CT/HRCT, visually detectable metabolism and semi-quantitative method.Results Of the 48 patients examined with 18F-FDG PET/CT alone, 32 malignant SPNs and 8 benign ones were diagnosed correctly, but there were 4 false positive ones and 4 false negative ones. Among the 76 cases examined with 18F-FDG PET/CT plus HRCT, 62 malignant and 8 benign SPNs were diagnosed correctly,with 2 false positive and 4 false negative ones. The sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with HRCT were higher than those of PET/CT alone(94%,80% and 90% vs 89%,67% and 83%).Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with HRCT can improve the sensitivity ,specificity and accuracy in differentiating SPN.
|
|
Received: 20 January 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Imdahl A,Jenkner S,Brink I,et al.Validation of FDG positron emission tomography for differentiation of unknown pulmonary lesions[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001,20(2):324-329.
|
| [2] |
Bunyaviroch T, Coleman R E. PET evaluation of lung cancer[J].J Nucl Medi, 2006, 47(3): 451-469.
|
| [3] |
Aquino S L, Halpem E F, Kuester L B , et al. FDG-PET and CT features of non-small cell lung cancer based on tumor type[J]. Int J Mol Med,2007,19(3):495-499.
|
| [4] |
Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis[J]. J Nucl Med 2009,50 Suppl 1:11S-20S.
|
| [5] |
Ober van Gómez López, Ana María García Vicente1, Antonio Francisco Honguero Martínez, et al. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of pulmonary solitary nodules:comparison of different analysis methods and risk variables in the prediction of malignancy[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2015,4(3):228-235
|
| [6] |
Aquino S L, Halpem E F, Kuester L B , et al. FDG-PET and CT features of non-small cell lung cancer based on tumor type[J].Int J Mol Med,2007,19(3):495-499.
|
| [7] |
Mylene T Truong, Jane P Ko, Santiago E Rossi, et al. Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule[J]. Radio Graphics, 2014, 34(6):1658-1679.
|
| [8] |
Lee H Y, Lee K S. Ground-glass opacity nodules: histopathology, imaging evaluation, and clinical implications[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2011,26(2):106-18.
|
| [9] |
Duilio D, Mirko B, Luca B, et al. Standardized uptake value and radiological density attenuation as predictive and prognostic factors in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules: our experience on 1,592 patients[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2017,9(8):2551-2559.
|
| [1] |
. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(2): 162-164. |
|
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 29 
