经直肠和经会阴活检对前列腺癌诊断价值的Meta分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (883 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of transrectal (TR) vs transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Methods Such databases as PubMed,Embase, Web of Science, CNKI and Baidu Scholar were searched systematically. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Review manager 5.3 software. The odds ratio of the combined 95% confidence interval was calculated to assess the difference in detection rates of prostate cancer between the rectal (TR) and perineal (TP) groups. A total of 1561 patients were enrolled and randomized to the rectal (TR) and perineal (TP) groups.Results Finally, five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that no significant difference was found in the detection rate of prostate cancer (OR=1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.25) or PSA levels (OR=-0.13, 95% CI -0.71－0.45). However, in terms of the prostate volume, there was significant difference between the two groups(OR=-3.28, 95% CI -6.40－-0.6).Conclusions There is no statistically significant difference in the PCA detection rate between TP prostate biopsy and TR prostate biopsy.

Key words： transrectal transperineal prostate biopsy prostate cancer meta-analysis

Received: 05 November 2018

ZTFLH:

R737.25

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Tao
	WANG Qunsuo
	WANG Songtao

Cite this article:

WANG Tao,WANG Qunsuo,WANG Songtao. Meta-analysis of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(6): 469-471.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2019/V30/I6/469

[1]	Schroder F H, Hugosson J, Roobol M J, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(13):1320-1328.
[2]	Hodge K K, McNeal J E, Terris M K, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate[J]. J Urol, 1989, 142(1):71-75.
[3]	Heidenreich A, Bastian P J, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013 [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(1):124-137.
[4]	Guo L H, Wu R, Xu H X, et al. Comparison between ultrasound guided transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial [J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5:16089.
[5]	Cerruto M A, Vianello F, D’Elia C, et al. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution [J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2014, 86(4):284-287.
[6]	Miano R, D Nunzio C, Kim F J, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for predicting the final laterality of prostate cancer: are they reliable enough to select patients for focal therapy? Results from a multicenter international study [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2014, 40(1):16-22.
[7]	Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy [J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2008, 11(2):134-138.
[8]	Kawakami S, Yamamoto S, Numao N, et al Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer [J]. Int J Urol, 2007,14(8):719-724.
[9]	Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy [J]. Urology, 2008, 71(2):191-195.
[10]	Scattoni V, Maccagnano C, Capitanio U, et al. Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?[J]. World J Urol, 2014, 32(4):859-869.
[11]	Carter H B. American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale [J]. BJU Int, 2013, 112(5):543-547.
[12]	Shen P F, Zhu Y C, Wei W R, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Asian J Androl, 2012, 14(2):310-315.
[13]	Nakaoka H, Inoue I. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: methodologies, between-study heterogeneity and winner’s curse [J]. J Hum Genet, 2009, 54(11):615-623.