不同血液净化方式对维持性血透患者微炎性状态的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (653 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effects of different blood purification modalities on the micro-inflammatory status in maintenance hemodialysis(MHD) patients.Methods A total of 140 patients were equally randomized into four groups to receive 12-month blood purification treatment with hemodialysis (HD),hemoperfusion(HP), high-flow hemodialysis(HFD) and hemodiafiltration(HDF) respectively. Pre- and post-treatment serum concentrations of micro-inflammatory indexes including serum C-reactive protein(CRP),interlerkin-6(IL-6), tumornecrosis factors α(TNF-α), procalcitonin(PCT), serum creatinine(SCR), blood urea nitrogen(BUN), β₂-microglobulin(β₂-MG), homocysteine(Hcy) and intact parathyroid hormone(iPTH) were determined and compared.Results The levels of inflammatory response factors(CRP,IL-6, TNF-α and PCT) were significantly increased (P<0.05) after treatment, and were significantly higher in HDF and HFD groups than those in HD and HP groups(P<0.05), but no significant difference of the four indexes was found between the HFD group and the HDF group. The levels of uremic toxins(iPTH、Hcy、β₂-MG) after treatment were significantly reduced in HP,HDF and HFD groups (P<0.05), and were significantly lower in HP,HDF and HFD groups than those in the HD group(P<0.05).Moreover, the levels of iPTH、Hcy and β2-MG after treatment were significantly lower in HDF and HFD groups than those in the HP group(P<0.05), but no significant difference of these uremic toxins was found between the HFD group and the HDF group.Conclusions Both HFD and HDP can adequately eliminate large or moderate toxin molecules in patients with MHD and improve the micro-inflammatory status of uremic patients significantly, but no significant difference has been found between these two groups in terms of therapeutic effect.

Key words： blood purification hemodialysis micro-inflammatory status

Received: 20 March 2019

ZTFLH:

R692

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIANG Rui
	HUI Zengqian
	WANG Jialin
	YU Yong
	ZHANG Boxiang

Cite this article:

LIANG Rui,HUI Zengqian,WANG Jialin等. Effect of different blood purification modalities on micro-inflammatory status in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(7): 603-606.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2019/V30/I7/603

[1]	彭致远,王金良,孙占山,等.不同透析方式对维持性血液透析患者微炎性反应状态的影响[J].临床肾脏病杂志,2015,15(2):106-109.
[2]	张晓东,张建荣,朱愿,等.维持性血液透析患者微炎性反应状态与颈动脉内中膜厚度进展的相关性研究[J].武警医学,2012,23(12):1056-1059.
[3]	Wanner C,Zimemann J,Schwedler S,et al.Inflammation and cardiovascuar risk in dialsis patients[J]. Kidney Int Suppl,2002,61(80):99-102.
[4]	陈利宏,王强,高秀侠.厄贝沙坦联合左卡尼汀对维持性血液透析患者微炎性反应和营养状态的影响[J].武警医学,2011,22(3):212-215.
[5]	徐忠,陈焕燃,乔振才,等.颈静脉蛛网膜下腔异常在Chiari畸形合并脊髓空洞症发病机制中意义的研究[J].武警医学,2004,15(3):182-186.
[6]	Silva J,Melo L R,Araujo A F,et al.Resolution of syringomyelia in ten cases of “up-and-down Chiari malformation”after posterior fossa decompression[J].Arq Neuropsiquiatr,2010,68(5):694-699.
[7]	Tamaki K,Kogata Y,Sugiyama D,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of serum procalcito-nin consentraions for detecting systemic bacterial infection in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases[J].J Rheumatol,2008,35(2):114-119.
[8]	许树根,沈淑琼,李彩凤,等.高通量透析改善老年血液透析患者微炎性反应状态的临床研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2013,14(6):510-512.
[9]	范文奎,杨红,陈光先,等.高通量血液透析对血清钙、磷和甲状旁腺激素的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(1):24-26.
[10]	Chu P L,Chiu Y L,Lin J W,et al.Effects of low-and highflux dialyzers on oxidative stress and insulin resistance[J].Blood Purif,2008,26(1):213-220.
[11]	徐丰博,孙懿,刘惠兰.高通量血液透析对维持性血液透析患者微炎性反应状态的影响[J].中国血液净化,2011,10(3):133-135.
[12]	刘娜,周露,丁鲲,等.高通量血液透析对尿毒症患者微炎性反应及营养状态的影响[J].临床肾脏病杂志,2017,17(11):667-670.