|
|
|
| Surgical rehabilitation effect of general anesthesia combined with preventive diazocine analgesia on compression lumbar fracture in elderly patients |
| YANG Yanjun1,GUAN Wenchuan2,GAO Jinyong1,JIAO Yan1,and LI Jing1 |
1.Department of Anesthesiology, Henan Provincial Corps Hospital, Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Zhengzhou 450052, China;
2.Department of Anesthesiology,Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of dizoxine on prophylactic analgesia and on rehabilitation of elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia for compression lumbar fractures.Methods Between January 2018 and December 2018, 100 cases of elderly patients with compression fractures of the lumbar spine who underwent surgery in our hospital were sellected as the subjects. These patients were randomly divided into the fentanyl group and dizoxin group. Preoperative and intraoperative patients were given different doses of anesthetic drugs to observe the changes of their surgical conditions and laboratory indicators.Results There was no difference in the duration of anesthesia, time for extubation, waking hours and the time taken to recover consciousness between the two groups. The blood glucose level, blood lactic acid level, plasma adrenalin concentration, norepinephrine concentration and cortisol concentration were significantly different between the two groups at the time of suture, 1 h and 24 h after surgery (P<0.05). At 4 h, 8 h and 24 h after surgery, the visual analogue pain score in the dizoxin group was significantly lower than that in the fentanyl group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the dizoxin group was significantly lower than that in the fentanyl group (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of patients in the dizoxin group was 92%, which was significantly higher than that of the fentanyl group (P<0.05).Conclusions During general anesthesia surgery for compression lumbar fractures in the elderly, intravenous dizoxine injection 15 minutes before surgical incisions can obtain good postoperative analgesic and preventive effects, with fewer adverse reactions and higher levels of patient satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical application.
|
|
Received: 11 July 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
唐 帅,黄宇光.术后镇痛理念新跨越:从超前镇痛到预防性镇痛[J].协和医学杂志,2014,5(1):106-109.
|
| [2] |
Karino Y,Toyota J,Kumada H,et al. Efficacy and resistance of entecavir following 3 years of treatment of Japanese patients with lamivudine refractory chronic hepatitis B[J]. Hepatol Int,2016,4(1):414-422.
|
| [3] |
徐四七,王胜斌,居 霞,等.全麻苏醒期持续静脉靶控输注瑞芬太尼对气管拔管时的影响[J].武警医学,2016,34(2):109-111.
|
| [4] |
曾彦茹,佘守章,黄宇光.阿片类药物地佐辛临床应用研究现状[J].广东医学,2018,39(1):6-9.
|
| [5] |
李廷坤,卢锡华,吕帅国,等.地佐辛对丙泊酚全麻恢复期BIS和苏醒质量的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,30(10):995-997.
|
| [6] |
周宇平, 张贤忠, 胡 勇, 等. 地佐辛与罗哌卡因联合塞来昔布在创伤骨折患者腰-硬联合麻醉中的镇痛效果[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2019,12(24):4-5.
|
| [7] |
苏 珍,张 阳,刘 艳,等.地佐辛超前镇痛对鼻内镜手术患者全麻气管拔管不良反应的干预作用[J].中国应用生理学杂志,2014,30(5):394-395.
|
| [8] |
严广斌.视觉模拟评分法[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014(2):34.
|
| [9] |
王 华.快速康复外科护理对外科手术患者恢复的影响分析[J].中国医药指南,2019,17(1):187-188.
|
| [10] |
Dosenovic S, Kadic A J, Miljanovic M, et al. Interventions for neuropathic pain: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 125(2):643-652.
|
| [11] |
钟瑜婷,刘怀萍.地佐辛对预防全麻插管苏醒期躁动的疗效观察[J].武警医学,2017,28(1):40-42.
|
| [12] |
Yamini S, Mandeep S, Jean W, et al. Understanding phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea: applications in anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 124(1):179.
|
| [13] |
Tan A T,Koh S,Gob W,et al. A longitudinal analysis of innate andadaptive immune profile during hepatic flares in chronjc hepatitis B[J].J Hepatol,2017,52:330-339.
|
| [14] |
李日长,元春梅,叶宏立.地佐辛联合舒芬太尼在肝癌射频消融术后自控静脉镇痛的效果[J].武警医学,2016,27(9):49-51.
|
| [15] |
张吉培.关节镜术患者术后应用地佐辛、吗啡、纳布啡等进行镇痛的效果对比[J].医药前沿,2017,7(13): 230-231.
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 31 
