|
|
Clinical effect of dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap in repairing deep wounds of fingers with |
LIU Jiangtao, WANG Yiyong, LIN Yifeng, HUANG Shurun |
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, the 910th Hospital of Chinese PLA Joint Service Support Force, Quanzhou 362000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap in repairing deep finger injuries.Methods From June 2018 to October 2021, 86 cases of finger injuries complicated with tendon and/or bone exposure were selected from the Burn and Plastic Surgery Department of the 910th Hospital of Chinese PLA Joint Service Support Force. They were divided into a study group and a control group, with 43 cases in each group according to surgical methods. The study group was repaired with a dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap, while the control group was treated with an abdominal flap. The number of surgeries, wound healing time, and hospitalization time of the two groups were observed. After discharge, the patients were followed up for 10-12 months to observe the appearance, texture, and skin temperature of the flaps. Hand function was evaluated using TAM in both groups of patients.Results The number of operations in the study group (1.2±0.4) was significantly less than that in the control group (2.5±0.6). The wound healing time [(15.2±3.4) d] and hospitalization time [(18.3±4.6) d] in the study group was significantly shorter than those in the control group [(26.6±4.8) d and (29.5±6.8) d]. Follow-up visit for 10-12 months showed that the flap in the study group had a more similar texture to the wound margin and a less bulky appearance compared with the control group. In the control group, 12 cases had a bulky appearance and were admitted to the hospital for a second stage flap thinning surgery 6 months after surgery. After 12 months of wound healing, the evaluation of hand function in the study group was excellent in 35 cases, good in 6 cases, and moderate in 2 cases. The evaluation of hand function in the control group was excellent in 23 cases, good in 10 cases, and moderate in 10 cases.Conclusions The application of dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap for deep finger wound repair is characterized by positive effects, fewer times of operation, quicker recovery and good appearance and function recovery.
|
Received: 01 April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
宋德恒,刘继松,李 勇,等.人工真皮复合自体刃厚皮移植与自体皮瓣移植修复手部深度软组织缺损的比较研究[J].感染、炎症、修复,2017,18(1):27-31.
|
[2] |
刘少华,李有斌,范嘉文,等.旋股外侧动脉降支游离穿支皮瓣修复伴骨外露的踝部皮肤软组织缺损[J].中华整形外科杂志,2021,37(7):790-794.
|
[3] |
蒋 亮,朱红菊,唐佳玉,等. 藻酸盐敷料联合rhGM-CSF用水胶体封闭治疗肌腱、骨外露的疗效研究[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2020,15(5):376-382.
|
[4] |
沈余明,陈 旭,张 琮,等.旋股外侧动脉降支血流桥接皮瓣修复患者腕部高压电烧伤创面的效果[J].中华烧伤杂志,2017,33(7):422-425.
|
[5] |
黄书润,刘江涛,欧阳容兰. 分期分段结扎腹部皮瓣法在修复手部热压伤中的应用[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2014,26(8):57-59.
|
[6] |
潘达德,顾玉东,侍 德,等.中华医学会手外科学会上肢部分功能评定试用标准[J].中华烧伤杂志,2000,16(3):130-135.
|
[6] |
王田佺,胡德庆,林海青,等.虎口掌侧动脉背侧穿支蒂跨区供因皮瓣的解剖基础[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2020,38(2):127-130.
|
[7] |
De S D,Sebastin S J. Considerations in fiap selection for soft tissue defects of the hand[J].Clin Plastic Surg,2019,46(3): 393-406.
|
[8] |
狄海萍,母心灵,史继静,等.人工真皮联合刃厚皮修复手足骨骼与肌腱外露创面效果的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中华烧伤杂志,2021,37(12):1130-1136.
|
[9] |
姜晓华,徐世健,马合龙,等.人工真皮结合刃厚皮片移植在复杂性手外伤创面闭合中的应用[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2022,26(6):458-461.
|
[10] |
吴长兴,糜庆伟.背筋膜皮瓣修复与指动脉岛状皮瓣修复术治疗指端缺损的临床效果比较[J].国际医药卫生导报,2019,25(16):2688-2690.
|
[11] |
张晓启,胥学兵,史昌乾,等.腓动脉和胫后动脉穿支筋膜皮瓣修复足部软组织缺损的效果[J].武警医学,2021,32(9):743-746.
|
[12] |
韦建新.掌背动脉穿支皮瓣修复治疗手指软组织缺损患者疗效观察[J].西藏医药,2021,41(3):53-55.
|
[13] |
黄 昱,杨俊贵,罗人彰.回顾性分析皮瓣修复术在手部皮肤软组织缺损患者临床治疗中的应用效果[J].中国伤残医学,2021,29(10):48-50.
|
[14] |
黄书润,刘江涛,张 勇,等.手部烧创伤后复杂创面的修复[J].中华烧伤杂志,2019,35(5):362-366.
|
[15] |
周莉萍,张文浩,王玉龙.远位埋没缝合切口减张技术联合电子线照射治疗瘢痕疙瘩九例[J].中华整形外科杂志,2019,35(3):278-281.
|
[16] |
张晓启,胥学冰,史昌乾,等.腓动脉和胫后动脉穿支筋膜皮瓣修复足部软组织缺损的效果[J].武警医学,2021,32(9):743-746.
|
[17] |
魏振强,赵 燚,魏海峰,等.第二掌背动脉皮瓣接力示指背侧岛状皮瓣修复拇指软组织缺损[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,37(1):37-40.
|
[18] |
王 辉,霍永鑫,王红涛,等.改良掌背动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复手部较大面积皮肤缺损[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2022,36(10):1273-1276.
|
|
|
|