阿德福韦酯治疗失败的慢性乙型肝炎两种挽救治疗方案比较

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (623 KB) RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的比较替诺福韦酯单药序贯治疗与恩替卡韦单药序贯治疗在挽救阿德福韦酯(adefovir dipivoxil,ADV)抗病毒治疗后应答不佳,或发生病毒学突破的慢性乙型肝炎患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法将120例对ADV初治失败的慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为替诺福韦酯 (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,TDF) 组和恩替卡韦(entecavir,ETV)组,每组60例。TDF组给予TDF 300 mg/d,序贯治疗;ETV组给予ETV 0.5 mg/d治疗,所有患者均治疗48周。给药的治疗基线、12周、24周和48周分别进行病毒学、生化学、血清学检测。分析比较两组患者上述治疗时间点的完全病毒学应答率、ALT复常率、病毒学突破率和HBeAg血清学转换率及观察肾功能损害情况。结果 TDF组治疗48周后完全病毒学应答率为63.3％(38/60), ETV组为78.3％(47/60),两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TDF组的ALT复常率、HBeAg血清学转换率、病毒学突破率分别为57.8％ (26/45)、13.6% (6/44)、0,ETV组分别为60.4％(29/48)、14.9% (7/47)、0,两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组患者对药物耐受性均良好,治疗过程中未发生因血肌酐升高停药的明显不良反应。结论对于ADV治疗后疗效欠佳或发生病毒学突破的慢性乙型肝炎患者,恩替卡韦单药序贯治疗是一种疗效理想、安全的挽救治疗方案,抗病毒疗效优于替诺福韦酯单药序贯治疗。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李忠斌
	邵清
	夏晶
	李冰
	李梵
	阿尔新
	陈松海
	王春艳
	陈国凤

关键词 ：慢性乙型肝炎, 阿德福韦酯, 恩替卡韦, 替诺福韦酯, 挽救治疗

Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) monotherapy and entecavir(ETV) monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with treatment failing to adefovir dipivoxil(ADV)therapy.Methods A total of 120 chronic hepatitis B patients with of ADV failure were investigated, and randomly divided into equally two groups. Sixty patients with chronic hepatitis B on rescue treatment with TDF(300 mg/d) monotherapy for 48 weeks served as group A were analyzed retrospectively.The serum HBV DNA levels,HBeAg,ALT and serum creatinine(Cr) were evaluated at weeks 0,12,24,48. In addition,data of 60 patients treated with ETV(0.5 mg/d) monotherapy for 48 weeks serving as group B were also collected.Results After 48 weeks follow-up,the virological response(VR) rate were 63.3％(38/60) in group A and 78.3％(47/60) in group B,respectively,and P value less than 0.05 when the two groups were compared. But the ALT normalization rate,seroeonversion rate (from HBeAg to HBeAb),the virologic breakthrough(VB) rate were 57.8％ (26/45),13.6% (6/44),0 in group A,respectively.Meanwhile,in group B,they were 60.4％(29/48),14.9% (7/47),0,respectively with P value not showing significant difference between the two groups. Both groups showed comparable tolerance and not found elevated Cr at the end of treatment.Conclusions The therapy of ETV monotherapy is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for chronic hepatitis B patients with a treatment failing to ADV therapy,and is superior to TDF monotherapy rescue strategy.

Key words： chronic hepatitis B adefovir dipivoxil entecavir tenofovir disoproxil fumarate rescue treatment

收稿日期: 2015-08-11

ZTFLH:

通讯作者: 陈国凤 E-mail: guofengchen302@163.com

作者简介: 李忠斌,硕士,主治医师。

引用本文:

李忠斌, 邵清, 夏晶, 李冰, 李梵, 阿尔新, 陈松海, 王春艳, 陈国凤. 阿德福韦酯治疗失败的慢性乙型肝炎两种挽救治疗方案比较[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(3): 253-256. LI Zhongbin,SHAO Qing,XIA Jing,LI Bing,LI Fan,A Erxin,CHEN Songhai,WANG Chunyan,and CHEN Guofeng. Comparison of efficacy of two kinds of rescuing treatments in chronic hepatitis B patients with treatment failing to adefovir dipivoxil therapy. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(3): 253-256.

链接本文:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/ 或 http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/Y2016/V27/I3/253

[1]	European, Association.For The Study of The Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection[J]. J Hepatol,2012,57(1):167-185.
[2]	乙型肝炎耐药讨论会专家.核苷和核苷酸类药物治疗慢性乙型肝炎的耐药及其管理[J].中国肝脏病杂志,2013,21(1):15-22.
[3]	中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2010,19(1):13-24.
[4]	Hadziyannis S J,Tassopoulos N C,Heathcote E J,et al.Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitisB for up to 5years[J].Gastroenterology, 2006, 131(9):1743-1751.
[5]	Marcellin P,Chang T L,Lim S G,et al.Long-term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B[J].Hepatology,2008,48(12): 750-758.
[6]	Minde Z,Yimin M,Ouangbi Y, et al.Five years of treatment with adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B[J].Liver Int, 2012,32(6):137-146.
[7]	WHO.Guidelines for the prevention,care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection[EB/OL].[2015-03-12].http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/hepatitis/hepatitis-b-guidelines/en/.
[8]	Nguyen M H, Trinh H N, Do S T, et al. Complete viral suppression(CVS) rates at year 2 in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients who were switched to entecavir monotherapy: a multicenter study[J]. Hepatology,2011,54(4):S73.
[9]	Hu C Y, Liu Y M, Liu Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily: an open-label,single and multiple-dose study in healthy chinese subjects[J]. Clin Ther,2013,35(12):1884-1889.
[10]	Gordon S C, Krastev Z, Horban A, et al. Efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at 240 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B with high baseline viral load[J]. Hepatology, 2013,58(2):505-513.
[11]	Liaw Y F, Sheen I S, Lee C M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver disease[J]. Hepatology, 2011,53(1):62-72.
[12]	Marcellin P, Gane E J, Tsai N, et al. Seven years of treatment with tenofovir DF for chronic hepatitis B virus infection is safe and well tolerated and associated with sustained virological, biochemical and serological responses with no detectable resistance [J]. Hepatology, 2013, 58(S): 649A.
[13]	Dupouey J, Gerolami R, Solas C, et al. Hepatitis B virus variant with the a194t substitution within reverse transcriptase before and under adefovir and tenofovir therapy[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2012,36(2):e26-e28.
[14]	黄艳萍,祝峰,王新元,等. 乙型肝炎前S1、S2抗原与HBV-DNA的相关性分析[J]. 武警医学, 2015, 26(6): 600-602.
[15]	Keskin O, Ormeci A C, Baran B, et al. Efficacy of tenofovir in adefovir-experienced patients compared to treatment-na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis B[J]. Antivir Ther,2014,8(1):64-65.
[16]	Lee C I, Kwon S Y, Kim J H, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients with previous nucleo(s/t)ide treatment failure[J].Gut Liver, 2014,8(1):64-69.