胫骨平台骨折术后不同镇痛方法效果的比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (722 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the different effects of the three analgesic Methods in surgical patients with fracture of tibial plateau. Methods Ninety surgical patients with fracture of tibial plateau in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital were randomly divided into three groups: continuous femoral nerve block group (group F), continuous sciatic nerve block group (group S) and continuous intravenous analgesia group (group V). All anesthesia Methods were combined with spinal-epidural anesthesia. In group F and group S, the catheter for nerve block was respectively placed after operation and analgesic Methods in two groups, including analgesic total volume of 0.2% ropivacaine, basic doses of 5 ml/h, single adding dose of 5 ml and locking time of 30 minutes. In group V, 1 μg/ml sufentanil 250 ml, 3 ml/h, 3 ml and 15 minutes were corresponding Methods with group F and group S. For visual analogue scale (VAS) above 4, 50 mg pethidine acting as remedial analgesic drug was given. VAS scores in the three groups were compared at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h after operation. The times of adding, total doses in 24 h and 48 h, the satisfaction with pain management, complications and coagulation function were recorded. Results The VAS scores in group F and group S were significantly lower than in group V, the difference was statistically significantly different (P＜0.05). After 24 h, 48 h, dosages in Group F were (133.9±10.7) ml, (169.3±13.4) ml; (124.6±11.6) ml, (15.57±12.9) ml dosage in group S, respectively with the group V, the dosage of (172.1±15.2) ml, (233.4±14.1) ml were compared, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The pressing times in Group F and Group S after operation 24 h and 48 h were compared with that in Group V, the difference was statistically significantly different (P＜0.05). Conclusions Analgesic effect of the nerve block has an advantage over that of intravenous anesthesia. The effect of sciatic nerve block is better than that of femoral nerve block.

Key words： fracture of tibial plateau femoral nerve block sciatic nerve block vein controlled analgesia

Received: 10 May 2016

ZTFLH:

R971.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Yujin
	ZHANG Xiaoguang
	YUAN Shuang
	and WANG Geng

Cite this article:

LI Yujin,ZHANG Xiaoguang,YUAN Shuang等. Comparison of different analgesia methods after tibial plateau fracture surgery[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(9): 917-919.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2016/V27/I9/917

[1]	中华创伤骨科杂志编辑委员会.胫骨平台骨折诊断与治疗的专家共识[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(1):3-10.
[2]	Kandemir U,Maclean J. Surgical approaches for tibialplateau fractures [J]. J Knee Surg,2014, 27(1):21-23.
[3]	Weaver M J, Harris M B, Strom A C, et al. Fracture patternand fixation type related to loss of reduction in bicondylartibial plateau fractures [J]. Injury, 2012,43(6): 864-869.
[4]	Sun H,Luo C F,Rang G,et al.Anatomical evaluation of the modified posterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fracture[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2013,23(7):809-818.
[5]	Heidari N,Lidder S,Grechenig W,et al.The risk of injury to theanterior tibialartery in the posterolateral approach to the tibia plateau:a cadaver study[J].J Orthop Trauma,2013,27(4):221-225.
[6]	He X,Ye P,Hu Y,et al.A posterior inverted L-shaped approach forthe treatment of posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133(1):23-28.
[7]	Solomon L B,Stevenson A W,Lee Y C,et al.Posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to unicondylar posterolateral tibial plateau fractures:acomparative study[J].Injury,2013,44(11):1561-1568.
[8]	韩传宝,钱燕宁,周钦海,等.术后镇痛对机体应激反应的调控[J]. 国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册), 2005,26(2):74-77.
[9]	杜建龙,王琦,张寒冰,等.氟比洛芬酯、帕瑞昔布钠用于创伤骨科手术后镇痛对机体应激反应的影响[J].中国医刊, 2013, 48(9):77-79.
[10]	Helmy S A,Wahby M A,Nawaway M. The effect of anesthesia and surgery on plasma cytokine production[J].Anesthesiology, 1999,54(8):733-738.
[11]	张云慧,顾新宇,刘清仁,等.超声引导神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中应用,[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(3):228-230.
[12]	陈希刚,田茂生,段俊峰.两种不同神经阻滞方法对全膝关节置换术后疼痛的影响[J].中外医学研究,2015, 13(20):8-9.
[13]	张高峰,陈斐,孙立新,等.不同镇痛方式对全膝关节置换术后镇痛效果及炎性反应的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(3):234-237.
[14]	黄天丰,张扬,方向志,等.股神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术患者术后镇痛的Meta分析[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2016,27(3):230-235.

[1]	. [J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2019, 30(8): 711-712.