|
|
Retrospective analysis of clinical risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of 1105 cases of premature rupture of membranes |
YANG Xuemei1,2 and SHANG Lixin1 |
1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Army General Hospital,Beijing 100700 China; 2.Dalian Medical University,Dalian 116044, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the high risk factors of premature rupture of membranes(PROM), the independent risk factors of preterm premature rupture of membranes(PPROM)and their effect on the modes of delivery and pregnancy outcomes.Methods The clinical data of 1105 pregnant women with PROM treated in the Army General Hospital between January 2013 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.Results (1)The incidence of PROM was 16.3%,that of PPROM was 2.8% and that of term premature rupture of membranes(TPROM) was 13.5%.(2)The main risk factors of PROM were the history of abortion or induced labor,reproductive tract infections,gestational diabetes,pregnancy with anemia, gestational hypertension disease, intrauterine pressure increases(abnormal fetal position, multiple pregnancies, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios),and uterine malformation.(3)The proportion of reproductive tract infections,multiple pregnancies,abnormal fetal positions,previous abortion or induced labor,gestational hypertension disease,gestational diabetes,placenta previa,and pregnancy with anemiain PPROM group was much higher than that in TPROM group,and the difference was significant.(4)The proportion of reproductive tract infections,multiple pregnancies,abnormal fetal positions,previous abortion or induced labor,placenta previa,and pregnancy with anemia were independent risk factors of PPROM(OR=3.387, 95%CI:1.468-13.337;OR=3.533, 95%CI:1.892-13.993,OR=1.680,95%CI:1.005-2.807,OR=1.635,95%CI:1.127-2.372,OR=3.020,95%CI:1.841-15.977,OR=3.177,95%CI:1.294-7.798,P<0.05).(5).The incidence of cesarean sections,puerperal infections,neonatal pneumonia,and neonatal asphyxia in PPROM group was significantly higher than that in TPROM group (P<0.05).Conclusions The risk factors of PROM are diverse and complicated. A good knowledge of the risk factors has important implications for clinical prevention and treatment of PROM and PPROM in particular.
|
Received: 20 October 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 胎膜早破的诊断与处理指南(2015)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50(1):3-8.
|
[2] |
谢 幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学(十二五普通高等教育本科国家级规划教材)[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013:133-135.
|
[3] |
周 容, 刘兴会. 重视胎膜早破的诊断[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版, 2014(2):6-10.
|
[4] |
Nakubulwa S, Dan K K, Bwanga F, et al. Genital infections and risk of premature rupture of membranes in Mulago Hospital, Uganda: a case control study[J]. BMCRes Notes, 2015, 8(1):1-9.
|
[5] |
Genc M R, Onderdonk A. Endogenous bacterial flora in pregnant women and the influence of maternal genetic variation[J]. BJOG, 2010, 118(2):154-163.
|
[6] |
Goya M, Bernabeu A, García N, et al. Premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks managed expectantly: maternal and perinatal outcomes in singletons[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(3):290-293.
|
[7] |
Liu L, Johnson H L, Cousens S, et al. Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000[J].Lancet,2012,379(9832):2151-2161.
|
[8] |
Lee S M, Park J W, Park C W, et al.“Early rupture of membranes” during induced labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas[J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(6):e39883.
|
|
|
|