腹腔内注入空气后CT扫描对判断肝脏位置变化的价值

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1924 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To implore the value of CT scanning after intraperitoneal air injection in determining the changes of liver position. Methods A total of 36 patients who underwent CT scanning after pneumoperitoneum operation in the Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from June 2019 to June 2022 were selected to observe the changes of liver position in different positions and measure the distance between the liver edge and abdominal wall in different positions. Results After pneumoperitoneography, the liver position of 36 patients showed clear changes. Supine position: the average distance between the leading edge of the liver and the anterior abdominal wall was (4.95±1.28) cm in the intestinal adhesion group and (4.64±1.11) cm in the non-intestinal adhesion group, with no statistical difference between the two groups (t=0.754,P=0.456). Left oblique position: the mean distance between the leading edge of the liver and the right anterior abdominal wall was (5.62±1.05) cm in the intestinal adhesion group and (5.44±0.53) cm in the non-intestinal adhesion group, with no statistical difference between the two groups (t=0.609,P=0.547). Right oblique position: the mean distance between the leading edge of the liver and the left anterior abdominal wall in the intestinal adhesion group was (5.62±1.50) cm, and the mean distance between the leading edge of the liver and the left anterior abdominal wall in the non-intestinal adhesion group was (4.95±0.80) cm, with no statistical difference between the two groups (t=1.578,P=0.124). Prone position: the mean distance between the liver posterior edge and the posterior abdominal wall in the intestinal adhesion group was (4.18±0.89) cm, and the mean distance between the liver posterior edge and the posterior abdominal wall in the non-intestinal adhesion group was (4.03±1.28) cm, with no statistical difference between the two groups (t=0.401,P=0.691). Conclusions After pneumoperitoneum, CT scanning is safe and effective. The position of the liver changes significantly, and the distance from the abdominal wall space becomes larger. In the four positions, the left oblique position and the right oblique position show larger liver movement distance.

Key words： pneumoperitoneum change of liver position body position CT scanning

Received: 26 December 2022

ZTFLH:

R445.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YAO Dingming
	CHEN Xiaoxia
	WANG Guisheng
	HUA Rongrong
	MEI Yu
	DAI Junnan
	GUO Yizhi
	LIU Yunxia

Cite this article:

YAO Dingming,CHEN Xiaoxia,WANG Guisheng等. Value of CT scanning after intraperitoneal air injection in determining the changes of liver position[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2023, 34(6): 465-468.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2023/V34/I6/465

[1]	蔚春雨. 粘连性肠梗阻患者应用腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术治疗的临床效果评价 [J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(24): 65-66.
[2]	朱小林, 吕铁升. 腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的临床疗效及并发症观察 [J]. 贵州医药, 2022, 46(7): 1093-1094.
[3]	侯雨双, 张智猗, 王贵生, 等. 人工气腹造影CT对肠粘连分级诊断的价值探讨 [J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2022, 20(9): 144-146.
[4]	候利华, 蔡晓军. 气腹CT腹膜腔三维仿真成像诊断术后腹腔粘连 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4):349-352.
[5]	孟凡强, 刘孝明, 刘海滨, 等. 超重和肥胖患者建立气腹新穿刺点的探讨 [J]. 中国医刊, 2019, 54(11): 1206-1207.
[6]	Crucitti M S. Statistical concerns about implementing a peri-operative neuromuscular blockade management strategy [J]. Anaesthesia, 2019, 74(3): 398.
[7]	沈冠豪, 华春华, 李奕秋, 等. CT实时引导下血肿穿刺置管引流术治疗脑出血的效果及安全性研究 [J].中国实用医药, 2020, 15(22): 24-26.
[8]	邓波, 孔鹏. 胸腔镜肺小结节切除术前微弹簧圈定位的临床应用研究[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(6): 954-957.
[9]	晋江涛. CT引导下经皮肺肿瘤穿刺活检在60例肺部恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值分析 [J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(10): 137-138.
[10]	刘昊, 刘建, 詹必成. 术前CT引导下Hookwire定位联合胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗孤立性肺结节应用研究 [J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36(8): 1155-1158.
[11]	盛杰, 朱洋, 地里下提·阿不力孜, 等. 超声、CT引导下经皮穿刺联合Xpert MTB/RIF技术早期诊断脊柱结核的价值 [J]. 医学信息, 2020, 33(8): 64-66.
[12]	陈姗姗, 白洁. 超声引导下微波消融术联合TACE治疗特殊部位中晚期原发性肝癌的疗效及安全性探讨 [J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(8): 995-997.
[13]	李冰, 射频消融术与开腹手术对原发性肝癌患者肝功能及免疫功能的影响比较 [J]. 河南医学研究, 2020, 29(4): 615-616.
[14]	柳明, 刘超, 李成利, 等. 影像引导肝癌的冷冻消融治疗专家共识(2020版) [J]. 中国医刊, 2020, 55(5): 489-492.
[15]	宋立文. 原发性肝癌患者介入治疗的现状及进展 [J]. 医疗装备, 2020, 33(4): 201-202.
[16]	徐超, 王媛, 贾秀青, 等. 经导管动脉栓塞化疗联合冷循环微波消融治疗原发性肝癌的远期随访研究 [J]. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(6): 614-617.
[17]	余守江, 王国兴, 马兰芳. TACE联合微波消融对原发性肝癌患者肿瘤组织灌注、免疫功能及预后的影响 [J]. 肝脏, 2020, 25(3): 294-296.
[18]	王岩, 董立男, 刘方义, 等. 三维可视化系统评估微波消融治疗原发性肝癌疗效的应用价值 [J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2022, 43(8): 840-844.
[19]	卞虎, 赵正兴, 戴建虎, 等. 人工腹水在膈面、脏面原发性肝癌微波消融治疗中的作用 [J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020 4(4): 153-154.
[20]	李博, 林杰. 肝脏三维重建技术较传统CT成像技术对肿瘤体积可提供更准确的术前评估 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(11): 1726-1732.