|
|
Computed tomography angiography(CTA) study on coronary atherosclerosis stenosis in risk factors asymptomatic population |
LIU Ye1, WANG Yaobin1, CHEN TianJin1, WEN YouXin1, HAN Xiangdong1,and YANG Li2 |
1.Radiology Department,2nd Hospital of Beijing Municipal Corps, Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Beijing 100037, China; 2..General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To make use of coronary CTA to determine the incidence rate of coronary atherosclerosis stenosis for non-diabetic asymptomatic people who have risk factors and evaluate its correlation with risk factors.Methods We recruited non-diabetic asymptomatic people who have high-risk factors (sex, age, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia) and divided them into single high-risk factor group and multiple high-risk factors group. We made statistical processing on the incidence rate of disease for people who had high-risk factors of coronary atherosclerosis.Results Single and multiple high risk factors between groups, the degree of luminal stenosis rate was highest for grade Ⅰ; along with increasing age,the incidence of class Ⅱ, Ⅲ grade luminal stenosis grew.Risk factors and coronary atherosclerosis luminal stenosis >50% compared with the control group, single risk factors and >40 years old and multiple risk factors group, incidence of coronary atherosclerosis luminal stenosis >50% had significant differences from the control group(P=0.0011,P=0.048,P=0.020). single risk factors and <40 years old groups, the incidence of coronary atherosclerosis luminal stenosis >50% had no significant difference from the control group (P=0.6013).Conclusions In asymptomatic non-diabetic population, coronary CTA in the prediction of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease severity provides important information. A large number of clinical data showed that coronary CTA can display plaque number and number of luminal stenosis ≥50%.
|
Received: 19 February 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Schuijf J D,Bax J J,Shaw L J,et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography[J].Am Heart J,2006,151:404-411.
|
[2] |
Mollet N R, Cademartiri F, Mieghem C A, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography[J]. Circulation,2005,112:2318-2323.
|
[3] |
Jin K N,Chun E J,Lee C H,et al.Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in young adults: prevalence, characteristics, predictors with coronary computed tomography angiography[J]. J Cardiovasc Imaging,2012,2:93-100.
|
[4] |
Kannel W B. Risk stratification in hypertension: new insights from the Framingham Study[J]. Am J Hypertens, 2000,13: 3S-10S.
|
[5] |
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography[J]. JAMA,2009,301: 500-507.
|
[6] |
Einstein A J, Henzlova M J, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-Slice computed tomography coronary angiography[J]. JAMA, 2007,298: 317-323.
|
[7] |
Hulten E A,Cheezum M,Fischer C, et al.The prognostic value of coronary CT angiography[J]. J Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports,2011,4:485.
|
|
|
|