高强度聚焦超声治疗瘢痕妊娠对卵巢储备功能的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (713 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) on ovarian reserve function during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods One hundred and forty-two patients with CSP Ⅱ treated between January 2013 and June 2018 were selected. According to pretreatment methods, these patients were divided into two groups: the HIFU group (n=96) in which HIFU was used and the UAE group (n=46) where UAE was used. After pretreatment, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy were performed. The levels of serum estradiol (E₂), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and the change of antral follicle count (AFC) were observed before operation and 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. These patients were followed up in order to record the side effects. Results (1) There was no statistically significant difference in AMH, FSH, LH, E₂ or AFC between patients in the HIFU group at different time points. (2) In the UAE group, there was no significant difference in E₂ between these patients before or after operation. However, AMH and AFC were significantly lower after 3, 6, 12 months. FSH and LH were significantly higher after 3 months and 6 months, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (3) There was no significant difference in AMH, FSH, LH, E₂ or AFC between the two groups before operation. AMH and AFC in the UAE group were significantly decreased 3 and 6 months after operation compared with the HIFU group at the corresponding time points. However, FSH and LH levels increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (4)Menstrual recovery rates in the HIFU group and UAE group were 98.9% and 91.3% respectively 5 weeks after operation. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate of blood β-HCG between the two groups 4 weeks after operation. Conclusions HIFU is safe, effective, non-invasive and repeatable during the treatment of CSP, which does not affect ovarian reserve function. HIFU is of special significance for CSP patients who hope for reproduction.

Key words： pregnancy cesarean section high intensity focused ultrasound uterine artery embolization ovarian reserve function

Received: 02 November 2019

ZTFLH:

R714

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Yahui
	LI Quanxiang
	YANG Na
	FU Linlin

Cite this article:

WANG Yahui,LI Quanxiang,YANG Na等. Effect of high intensity focused ultrasound on ovarian reserve function during the treatment of scar pregnancy[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2020, 31(5): 378-381.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2020/V31/I5/378

[1]	中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(8):2194-2197.
[2]	Qian Z D, Weng Y, Du YJ, et al. Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017, 17(1):208.
[3]	Zhu X, Deng X, Xiao S, et al. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy[J].Int J Hyperthermia,2016,32(2): 144-150.
[4]	王秦芳.子宫瘢痕妊娠子宫动脉栓塞术治疗的疗效及其对卵巢功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(1):180-182.
[5]	郭清,丁珍珍,徐锋,等.高强度聚焦超声在妇科疾病中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,8(10):28-31.
[6]	王李纲, 邹建中, 邓勇斌,等.高强度聚焦超声消融治疗子宫腺肌病合并子宫肌瘤的安全性及短期疗效评价[J].现代医药卫生,2016,32(9):1281-1283.
[7]	陈宝华, 桂雄建,毛英. 超声引导下经皮射频消融治疗黏膜下子宫肌瘤的有效性和安全性[J].武警医学,2019,30(10):870-872.
[8]	郭曲,许希中,余进进.不同腹腔镜子宫动脉阻断方法对卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 海南医学,2016,27(19):3176-3179.
[9]	Hwang D W,Song H S,Kim H S,et al.Delayed intestinal perforation and vertebral osteomyelitis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine leiomyoma[J].Obstet Gynecol Sci,2017,60(5):490-493.
[10]	Kim Y S,Kim T J,Lim H K,et al.Preservation of the endometrial enhancement after magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of submucosal uterine fibroids[J]. Eur Radiol,2017,27(9):3956-3965.
[11]	郎景和, 陈春林, 向阳, 等.子宫肌瘤及子宫腺肌病子宫动脉栓塞术治疗专家共识[J].中华妇产科杂志,2018,53(5):289-293.
[12]	王利琼.子宫动脉栓塞对剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠卵巢血流的影响[D].南充,川北医学院,2018.
[13]	Keung J J, Spies J B, Caridi T M. Uterine artery embolization: a review of current concepts[J].Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2018,46:66-73.
[14]	尚海霞,安海霞,孙静汾, 等. 不同类型剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠两种保守治疗方法疗效及卫生经济学比较[J].中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(5): 461-464.
[15]	顾玉蝉,赵蓉,田彪,等. 腹腔镜联合子宫动脉栓塞术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效 [J].武警医学,2016,27(4):356-362.