经阴分娩史对非插管静脉全麻下宫腔镜手术患者术中血流动力学及术后恢复情况的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (986 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨经阴分娩史对非插管静脉全麻下宫腔镜手术麻醉术中血流动力学及术后恢复情况的影响。方法检索解放军总医院第一医学中心麻醉临床信息系统,选取2008-08至2019-12在解放军第一医学中心498例行非插管静脉全麻下宫腔镜手术患者围手术期数据,将患者分为有经阴分娩史组(VD组)和无经阴分娩史组(NVD组),应用倾向性评分匹配(PSM),对两组患者的基线情况进行1∶1配对。对比麻醉前(T₁)、麻醉后1 min(T₂)、手术开始时(T₃)以及手术开始后5 min(T₄)的收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压及心率变化情况;对比两组患者术后随访疼痛NRS评分及恶心呕吐等不适症状的发生率。结果应用PSM后共354例(NVD组和VD组各177例)纳入分析。T₁与T₂时点两组患者收缩压、舒张压、心率变化未见明显差异;T₃与T₄时点NVD组较VD组收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压、心率升高(P<0.01);两组SpO₂在T₃时点未见差异,而在T₄时点NVD组SpO₂降低;两组手术时间未见差异;VD组患者术后苏醒时间及离院时间短于NVD组(P<0.01),术后疼痛NRS评分及术后恶心呕吐等不适发生率均低于NVD组(P<0.01)。结论经阴分娩史对非插管静脉全麻下宫腔镜手术中患者术中血流动力学及术后恢复质量有影响,提示针对患者是否有经阴分娩史应个性化调整麻醉管理方案和用药策略。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	于晓萌
	王苗苗
	闫志风
	娄景盛
	田冶

关键词 ：经阴分娩史, 非插管静脉全麻, 宫腔镜, 血流动力学

Abstract：Objective To evaluate the influence of vaginal delivery history on the intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery in patients treated with hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation.Methods Four hundred and ninety-eight patients admitted into the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital who were treated with hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation were divided into vaginal delivery history group (VD group) and no vaginal delivery history group (NVD group). The baseline conditions of the two groups were matched by propensity score. The changes of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before anesthesia (T₁), 1 minute after anesthesia (T₂), the beginning of operation (T₃) and 5 minutes after operation (T₄) between the two groups were compared, and the postoperative pain NRS score, nausea and vomiting were also compared.Results After propensity score matching, 354 patients (177 in NVD group and 177 in VD group) were enrolled in the analysis. There was no significant difference in SBP, DBP, MAP and HR between the two groups at T₁ and T₂ time points. At T₃ and T₄ time points, NVD group showed increased SBP, DBP, MAP and HR than those in VD group (P<0.01). There was no differences in SpO₂ between the two groups at T₃, while the SpO₂ was lower in NVD group at T₄. The surgery time didn’t show differences. VD group patients showed shorter postoperative awake time and hospital departure time (P<0.01), lower postoperative pain NRS score (P<0.01), and lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P<0.01).Conclusion The history of vaginal delivery has an impact on the intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery quality in patients treated with hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation, which suggests that the anesthesia management protocols and medication strategy should be individually adjusted for patients with or without a history of vaginal delivery.

Key words： history of vaginal delivery general intravenous anesthesia hysteroscopy hemodynamics

收稿日期: 2022-03-26

ZTFLH:

R614.2

通讯作者: 田冶,E-mail:tianye_1983_44@126.com

作者简介: 于晓萌,本科学历,医师。

引用本文:

于晓萌, 王苗苗, 闫志风, 娄景盛, 田冶. 经阴分娩史对非插管静脉全麻下宫腔镜手术患者术中血流动力学及术后恢复情况的影响[J]. 武警医学, 2022, 33(7): 581-585. YU Xiaomeng, WANG Miaomiao, YAN Zhifeng, LOU Jingsheng, TIAN Ye. Influence of vaginal delivery history on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery in patients treated with hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2022, 33(7): 581-585.

链接本文:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/ 或 http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/CN/Y2022/V33/I7/581

[1]	夏恩兰.宫腔镜手术并发症诊治现状及展望[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,31(5): 369-373.
[2]	陈鹏,杨清.日间宫腔镜手术的经验分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2019,48(12):1147-1149.
[3]	ACOG Committee Opinion. The use of hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology: number 800[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(3): e138-e148.
[4]	韩肇艺.宫腔镜手术的麻醉处理和体会[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2003,19(1): 53-54.
[5]	Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R. et al. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory 55 surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Anaesthesia, 2014,69(10):1138-1150.
[6]	颜娅.静脉麻醉下宫腔镜日间手术的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(10):1003-1004.
[7]	孔亮.宫腔镜诊治术前宫颈预处理方法研究进展[J].北京医学, 2020,42(4):323-326.
[8]	Mazzon I,Favilli A,Horvath S,et al.Pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy:what is the role of the cervical canal?A pilot study[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 265(183):169-173.
[9]	孙雪梅,张雷,毛煜,等.既往分娩史对无痛宫腔镜患者丙泊酚用量的影响[J]. 医学研究生学报,2019, 32(10):1059-1063.
[10]	Kumar S, Srivastava A, Sharma S, et al. One-year continuation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: findings from a retrospective cohort study in India[J]. Contraception, 2019, 99 (4): 212-216.
[11]	全紫薇.绝经期女性宫腔操作的相关问题[J].医学研究杂志,2019,48(8):186-188,157.
[12]	黄晓武,夏恩兰.宫颈组织结构与宫颈机能[J].国际妇产科学杂志, 2016, 43(6): 657-660.
[13]	江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2007,27(2):131-133.
[14]	中华医学会外科学分会与中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(1): 562-569.
[15]	Hassan A, Haggag H, Wahba A, et al. Tramadol versus Celecoxib for reducing pain associated with outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial [J]. Hum Reprod, 2016,31(1): 60-66.
[16]	中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科内镜学组. 宫腔镜手术子宫颈预处理临床实践指南[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(12): 813-818.
[17]	中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科内镜学组. 指南发布:促进宫腔镜手术子宫颈预处理的规范化[J].中华医学信息导报, 2021, 36(1):14.
[18]	曹淑萍,熊化军,姜萍.无痛人工流产术中丙泊酚用量与不同生育史的关系[J].中国妇幼保健, 2009,24(28):3990-3991.
[19]	曾祥玉,徐阳.无痛人流时丙泊酚用量与年龄的关系[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2007, 23(8):704.
[20]	Biela M M, Doniec J, Szafarowska M, et al. Is every patient eligible to have an office hysteroscopy? A retrospective analysis of 1301 procedures[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2020, 15(2):337-345.