|
|
Evaluation of safety of spermatic vein ligation under microscope for young patients with primary varicocele |
WENG Mai1, LIU Jianchun1, JING Jitao1, YU Hua1, FAN Hang1, LIU Madou1, and ZHOU Jing2 |
1.Department of Urology,Armed Police Corps Beijing Second Hospital,Beijing 100037,China; 2.Very Important People’s Health Care Department, General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Beijing 100039, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the safety of spermatic vein ligation under microscope for young patients with primary varicocele. Methods 80 primary varicocele patients in this hospital from June 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled for study and randomly divided into study group and control group.The study group received spermatic vein ligation under the microscope, the control patients received retroperitoneal spermatic vein ligation surgery. Then surgery condition, sperm quality, complications and recurrence between the two groups were compared. Results Operation:in the study group,postoperative bed time was[(1.05±0.45)d vs (5.36±0.72)d,P<0.05], hospitalization time was[(6.12±0.44)d vs (7.92±0.56)d,P<0.05], NRS pain score [(1.03±0.35) vs (2.75±0.48),P<0.05] were significantly lower than in the control group, operation time was significantly longer than in the control group.Semen quality: 3 months after surgery,in the study group,sperm density and sperm activitywer grade A, forward sperm activity rate was significantly higher than in the control group.Sperm movement ability: 3 months after surgery, in the study group,sperm speeding ahead, straight line movement,and curve movement were significantly higher than in the control group.Recurrence rate:in the study group.varicose vein recurrence rate 0.00% was significantly lower than in the control group 12.50%(P<0.05). Conclusions Spermatic vein ligation under a microscope helps to reduce surgical trauma, promotes postoperative recovery,improves sperm quality,and prevents long-term relapse.
|
Received: 24 November 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
韩矿军,张 燕,申秀香,等.显微镜下和腹腔镜下精索静脉结扎术中情况及术后并发症比较[J].中国性科学,2015,24(6):43-46.
|
[2] |
Naderi G, Mohseni Rad H, Tabassomi F, et al. Seminal insulin-like growth factor-I may be involved in the pathophysiology of infertility among patients with clinical varicocele[J]. Hum Fertil (Camb), 2015, 18(2):92-95.
|
[3] |
曾京华,胡卫列,罗汉宏,等.显微镜下经腹股沟途径与传统Palomo精索静脉结扎术治疗陆军精索静脉患者术后并发症的比较[J].南方医科大学学报,2013,33(1):138-141.
|
[4] |
世界卫生组织.WHO人类精液及精子-宫颈粘液相互作用实验室检验手册[M].谷翊群,陈振文,于和鸣,等,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:6-28.
|
[5] |
刘 骋,程 冬,张贤生,等. 显微镜下精索内静脉高位结扎与传统Palomo术式治疗精索静脉曲张的对比研究[J]. 中国男科学杂志,2011,25(10):55-57.
|
[6] |
马秀丽,余洪亮,张书红,等.显微镜下小切口精索静脉高位结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的临床效果观察[J].中国生育健康杂志,2014,25(4):316-318.
|
[7] |
Guevara C J, EI-Hilal A H, Darcy M D. Percutaneous antegrade varicocele embolization via the testicular vein in a patient with recurrent varicocele after surgical repair[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2015,38(5):1325-1329.
|
[8] |
吴科荣,苏新军,王国耀,等. 两种精索静脉结扎术对精液质量影响的研究[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志,2014,20(5):494-496.
|
[9] |
Kim K S,Lee C, Song S H, et al. Impact of internal spermatic artery preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence and the catch-up growth rate in adolescents[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2014,10(3):435-440.
|
[10] |
曾京华,罗汉宏,刘一梅,等.比较两种手术方式治疗重度精索静脉曲张对患者生精功能的影响[J].中国男科学杂志,2014,28(4):34-38.
|
[11] |
Mckinley J C, Robinson C M. Treatment fo displaced intracap-sularhip fractures with total heiparthroplasty: Comparison of primary atthroplasty with early salvage arthroplasty aftre failed intemalfixation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 84(11):2010-2015.
|
|
|
|