玻璃离子或树脂<img src='牙合补字小标.tif'/>垫治疗乳牙期及混合牙列早期前牙反<img src='牙合补字小标.tif'/>的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (692 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the advantage and disadvantage of occlusal guidance of glass ionomer cement or resin with traditional splint and lingual spring in clinical through the questionair for doctor.Methods 21 research items were investigated by 10 clinical doctors who can accomplish the therapy with those two methods to correct anterior crossbite skillfully. And the research items were: whether the oral impression, making appliance simplicity, early period comfort when wearing appliance, the length of appliance adaptation, appliance wearing time, wire broken of appliance, appliance wire scratching gingival mucosa, anterior tooth loose in the treatment, dental pain in the treatment, follow-up interval, oral hygiene, treatment duration, medical cost, the lower anterior teeth correction, cusp and fossa relationship close together, masticatory efficiency, pronunciation, appearance, children with the degree, the acceptance of guardian, comprehensive evaluation.Results Comparing the two treatment methods of 21 research items,the occlusal guidance of glass ionomer cement or resin and the traditional splint lingual spring in the course of orthodontic treatment, the questionnaire scores were 3.90±1.88 and 3.80±2.10, there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). However, for the oral impression, making appliance simplicity, comprehensive evaluation and other 20 evaluation items: the scores of the two treatment methods had highly significant difference (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional splint and lingual spring to correct anterior crossbite, the occlusal guidance of glass ionomer cement or resin is a fixed functional appliance, which can be easily operated in clinic and has many advantages. This technology is worthy of extensive promotion.

Key words： occluusal guidance of glass ionomer cement or resin splint and lingual spring deciduous dentition early mixed dentition anterior crossbite

Received: 20 February 2016

ZTFLH:

R783.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Xiaoru
	LI Xuyan
	ZHUANG Futao
	and PENG Jing

Cite this article:

YANG Xiaoru,LI Xuyan,ZHUANG Futao等. An investigating study of correcting anterior crossbite of deciduous and early mixed dentitions with occlusal guidance of glass ionomer cement or resin[J]. Med. J. Chin. Peop. Armed Poli. Forc., 2016, 27(6): 553-556.

URL:

http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/ OR http://journal08.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_wjyx/EN/Y2016/V27/I6/553

[1]	傅民魁,张丁,王邦康,等.中国25 392名儿童与青少年错畸形患病率的调查[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2002, 37(5): 371-373.
[2]	Wiedel A P, Bondemark L. Stability of anterior crossbite correction: a randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up[J]. Angle Orthodontist, 2015, 85(2): 189-195
[3]	彭静,陈琳,王诚炜,等.直丝弓矫治技术的临床应用分析[J]. 武警医学, 1997, 8(1): 27-28.
[4]	彭静,邓辉,曹采方. 6-12岁女童头影测量中颅面形态遗传作用的纵向分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(3): 292-299.
[5]	James K H, Lorri A M, Liliana M O, et al. Genetics and non-syndromic facial growth[J]. J Pediatric Genetics, 2013, 2(1): 9-20.
[6]	Nagahara K. A study of longitudinal changes in the dentition of the deciduous reverse bite using plaster casts[J]. Jpn J Ped Dent, 1989, 48(3): 275-303.
[7]	Peng J, Deng H, Cao C F, et al. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2005, 27(6): 556-561.
[8]	彭静,邓辉,曹采方. 6～12岁女童头影测量中上颌形态遗传影响的纵向分析[J]. 武警医学, 2009, 20(9): 793-796.
[9]	孙世阁, 李旭艳, 庄福涛, 等. 玻璃离子垫与传统垫舌簧矫治器治疗儿童前牙反的临床应用比较[J/CD]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志: 电子版, 2015, 9(3): 221-225.
[10]	Desouzacosta C A,Dpolidorio D P,Puppin-Rontani R M,et al. Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement codoxycycline hyclate[J]. Archives Oral Biol,2012,57(2):131-138.
[11]	Seren E, Akan H, Toller M O, et al. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in class iii malocclusions: a preliminary study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1994,105(5): 38-48.
[12]	Pedrazzi M E. Treating the open bite[J]. J Gen Orthop,1997, 8(1): 5-16.
[13]	Blanksma N C. Electromyogr aphic heterogeneity in the humantemporalis and masseter muscles during static biting, open/close excursions and chewing[J]. J Dent Res, 1995, 74(2): 1318-1327.
[14]	Behlfelt K, Linder Aronson S, McWilliam J, et al. Dentition in children with enlarged tonsils compared to control children[J]. Eur J Orthod,1989, 11(4): 416-429.
[15]	Meikle M C. Remodeling the dentofacial skeleton: the biological basis of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics[J]. J Dental Res,2007,86(1): 12-24.
[16]	Cevidanes L H,Franco A A,Gerig G,et al. Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors with high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,128(1): 27-34.
[17]	Cevidanes L H,Franco A A,Gerig G, et al. Assessment of mandibular growth and response to orthopedic treatment with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance images[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,128(1): 16-26.
[18]	Bondemak L,Wiedel A P. Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition - a randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2015, 137(2): 123-127.