Abstract: This paper derives four government-control modes from the interaction of government property-right boundary, administrative boundary and enterprise property-right boundary. Through the construction of a multi-agent model of government-enterprise interaction and simulation to test the impact of the four government-control models on corporate innovation activities, the results show that: (1) under the two-way separation mode, innovation investment is high and innovation performance is good; (2) by comparing the "administrative-fixed effect" and the "property-fixed effect", the administrative destructive power under the two-way-centralized control mode is stronger, the adaptability of enterprises lags behind, and there is "innovation inertia"; (3) Under the one-way property-right management mode, with the increase of parameter , innovation input is insufficient and innovation performance is low; (4) Under the one-way administrative management mode, with the enhancement of parameter , innovation investment and innovation performance are decreasing, and the initiative of enterprises' independent innovation is not high. Finally, aiming at different government-control modes, proposals for promoting corporate innovation activities are proposed.

摘要： 本文由政府产权边界、行政边界与企业产权边界的互动派生出四种政府管控模式。通过构建政企互动的多主体模型和模拟仿真来检验四种政府管控模式对企业创新活动的影响，结果显示:（1）双向分离模式下，创新投入高，创新绩效好；（2）通过对比“行政固定效应”与“产权固定效应”，双向集权管控模式下行政破坏力更强，企业适应力滞后，存在“创新惰性”；（3）单向产权管控模式下, 随着参数 值的不断增大，创新投入动力不足，创新绩效偏低；（4）单向行政管控模式下，随着参数 的加强，创新投入和创新绩效不断下降，企业自主创新积极性不高。最后，针对不同政府管控模式，提出促进企业创新活动的对策建议。