›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (11): 1601-1605.
• 科学学理论与方法 • 下一篇
张军荣,袁晓东
收稿日期:
修回日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
通讯作者:
基金资助:
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
摘要: 熊彼特的创新理论无法揭示技术创新发生的过程。集成创新、协同创新、开放式创新、创新网络等理论是对创新过程的揭示,但却带来了理论上的隔阂和混乱。通过比较分析发现开放式创新能够统合上述技术创新模式,并且能够避免集成创新和协同创新中的构建理性倾向,可以被称为一种技术创新“范式”。但是开放式创新具有稀释创造力、技术专属性差等缺点,并不是技术创新的唯一路径选择。
关键词: 集成创新, 协同创新, 开放式创新, 范式, Integrated Innovation, Synergetic Innovation, Open Innovation, Paradigm
Abstract: Schumpeter's innovation theory can not reveal the process of technological innovation. Integrated innovation, Synergetic Innovation, Open Innovation and Innovation Network theories reveal the process of innovation, but theoretical alienation and confusion are following. By comparative analysis, it was found that open innovation can be named a technology paradigm, for it can integrate the theories above and avoid the tendency of rational building in integrated innovation and synergetic Innovation. But open innovation would dilute creativity and be lack of technical exclusive. It would not be the only choice for technological innovation.
中图分类号:
F062.4
张军荣 袁晓东. 技术创新“范式”之争[J]. , 2013, (11): 1601-1605.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://journal08.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/CN/
https://journal08.magtechjournal.com/kxxyj/CN/Y2013/V/I11/1601