关键词: 国立科研机构, 同行评议方法, 模式比较, National Research Institution, Peer Review Method, Model Comparison

Abstract: Peer review has been the dominant method in Scientific Research Institutes evaluations, which plays a vital role in the strategy development and performance management of Scientific Research Institutes. Based on the practice of scientific research institutes evaluation in Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS), Max Planck Society (M&P), the laboratory of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), this paper analyzes the differences and characteristics from comparisons of several elements, including the evaluation object and content, experts sources and types, experts selection criteria and mechanisms, peer review organization and use of evaluation results. Lastly, this paper put forward some suggestions about peer review assessment approach in the future.