• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 625-633.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

校地共建大学孵化器中的划界及其流变

王路昊   

  1. 电子科技大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-28 修回日期:2018-12-12 出版日期:2019-04-15 发布日期:2019-04-24
  • 通讯作者: 王路昊
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金

The changing boundaries of the co-founded university incubator: an extended case study of TS Incubator

  • Received:2018-05-28 Revised:2018-12-12 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-04-24

摘要: 校地共建大学孵化器是当前各地建设创新型城市和推动科技成果转化的重要政策工具。然而,当前同质化的制度安排之下,共建孵化器的组织绩效却良莠不齐。对此,本研究以我国第一家校地共建的大学孵化器TS孵化器及其后来在Y省各地衍生的分院为案例,运用扩展个案研究,发现已有创新研究中的理论反常并尝试重构校地共建大学孵化器中的划界原理及其流变规律。研究发现,TS孵化器过去二十年经历了三个阶段的划界博弈,并具体形成了悬置型、松耦型、紧密型、流散型四种不同的边界组织状态。研究进一步通过打开“共识”和“基因重组”两个黑箱,指出求同之外的存异对于异质行动者围绕边界组织形成和维持结盟更加意义深远,而制度压力的回应和制度逻辑的选择则迫使孵化器或被动或主动地去面对划界的过程。

Abstract: As a new policy instrument of local governments, co-founded university incubators play a significant role in innovation city building and technology commercialization. However, under the homogeneous institutional structure, there is a great difference of organizational performance among co-founded university incubators. In this paper, we use extended case study method to unfold the process of the changing boundaries in TS Incubator which is the first co-founded university incubator in China. We reveal that there are 3 stages of boundary-drawing in the past 20 years, and TS Incubator as a boundary organization has changed its organizational forms 4 times for catering to different actors in the institutional environment. By opening the “black box” of “consensus” and “institutional hybrid”, we also find out the crux of maintain the hybridity of the incubator is not reaching consensus but reserving heterogeneity. Furthermore, institutional pressures and institutional logics are two important variables which influence the results of boundary-drawing.