全文引文分析视角下的造假论文学术影响研究

›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 0-0.

• 科学学理论与方法 •

全文引文分析视角下的造假论文学术影响研究

张春博¹,丁堃²,王贤文³,刘则渊³

1. 大连理工大学公共管理与法学学院科学学与科学技术管理研究所
2. 大连理工大学 WISE实验室
3. 大连理工大学

收稿日期:2020-02-25 修回日期:2020-12-17 出版日期:2021-04-15 发布日期:2021-05-28
通讯作者: 张春博
基金资助:
国家自然科学面上项目;中国科协高端科技创新智库青年项目（博士生项目）;华东师范大学学术评价与促进研究中心开放研究项目

Research on the impact of fraudulent paper to the academia from the view of citation analysis in full-text——Case study of two highly cited retracted publications

Received:2020-02-25 Revised:2020-12-17 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过施引文献的全文引文分析，展示了高被引造假论文对学术界所造成的微观影响以及撤销前后的影响变化情况，揭示其在学术界造成较大影响的原因以及科学自我纠错机制的作用发挥情况。首先，构建了包括引用情感、引文功能、引用对象以及引文重要性等维度在内的全文引文分析框架。然后，在自然科学与社会科学领域分别选择一篇代表性的高被引撤销论文作为案例样本。基于构建的全文引文分析框架，对这两篇论文的施引文献进行各维度的人工标注和描述分析。高影响力造假论文对学术界的影响巨大，但需全面辩证地看待。其获得很高的被引频次，与造假论文本身价值和学术界的引用时尚均有关系。科学自我纠错机制作用的发挥呈现学科领域的差异性。自然科学领域存在识别问题的能力，论文撤销的净化效果也较好。社会科学领域则基本没有纠错机制，论文撤销行为对其后续影响的净化也无显著作用。重复性研究机制很大程度上影响了二者在自我纠错方面的表现差异，包括重复性研究的动力和可行性。

关键词: 造假论文, 全文引文分析, 撤销论文, 学术影响, 科学自我纠错, 重复性研究

Abstract: Based on citation analysis in full-text to the citing literatures, this paper displays the micro impact of fraudulent paper to the academia and its changes after retraction, and also reveals the reasons for the large impact and the role of self-correction mechanism in science. Firstly, we construct the framework of citation analysis in full-text, which includes dimensions of citing sentiment, citation function, cited object and citation importance. And then, select a representative highly cited retracted publication as sample case in natural science and social science respectively. Based on the framework of citation analysis in full-text, we perform manual annotation and description analysis on their citing literatures. High-impact papers have a huge influence on academia, but it needs to be viewed dialectically. These fraudulent papers get many citations, which is related to the value of the paper itself and citation fashion in its field. Self-correction mechanism in science has different effect in natural and social science. Scientific community can identify the problem, and better purify its effect after retracting in natural science. Otherwise, there is almost no correction mechanism in social science, and retracting hardly works for the purification of subsequent effects. The mechanism of reproducible research, including motivation and feasibility of reproducible research, greatly affects the different performances of self-correction in science between natural science and social science.

Key words: fraudulent paper, citation analysis in full-text, retracted publication, academic impact, self-correction in science, reproducible research

张春博丁堃王贤文刘则渊. 全文引文分析视角下的造假论文学术影响研究[J]. , 2021, 39(4): 0-0.

参考文献

[1] Zuckerman H. Norms and deviant behavior in science[J]. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1984, 9(1): 7-13. [2] Bouter L M, Tijdink J, Axelsen N, et al. Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity[J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2016, 1(1): 1-17. [3] 赵蓉英，曾宪琴，陈必坤. 全文本引文分析——引文分析的新发展[J]. 图书情报工作. 2014, 58(9): 129-135. [4] Ding Y, Zhang G, Chambers T, et al. Content‐based citation analysis: the next generation of citation analysis[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology. 2014, 65(9): 1820-1833. [5] Tahamtan I, Bornmann L. Core elements in the process of citing publications: conceptual overview of the literature[J]. Journal of Informetrics. 2018, 12(1): 203-216. [6] Zhang G, Ding Y, Milojevi? S. Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013, 64(7): 1490-1503. [7] 陆伟，孟睿，刘兴帮. 面向引用关系的引文内容标注框架研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报. 2014, 40(6): 93-104. [8] Wan X, Liu F. Are all literature citations equally important? automatic citation strength estimation and its applications[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014, 65(9): 1929-1938. [9] Cano V. Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1989, 40(4): 284-290. [10] Small H. Citation context analysis[C]// Dervin B L, Voigt M J. Progress in Communication Sciences. New York: Ablex Publishing, 1982: 287-310. [11] Radoulov R. Exploring automatic citation classification[D]. Waterloo: University of Waterloo, 2008. [12] Mccain K, Turner K. Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics[J]. Scientometrics. 1989, 17(1-2): 127-163. [13] 胡志刚. 全文引文分析：理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016:118-122. [14] Macroberts M H, Macroberts B R. The negational reference: or the art of dissembling[J]. Social Studies of Science. 1984, 14(1): 91-94. [15] 王佳敏，李信，刘齐进. 全文本文献计量分析学术沙龙综述[J]. 信息资源管理学报. 2018, 8(4): 119-125. [16] Eisenhardt K M. Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic[J]. Academy of Management review. 1991, 16(3): 620-627. [17] Pan R K, Petersen A M, Pammolli F, et al. The memory of science: inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network[J]. Journal of Informetrics. 2018, 12(3): 656-678. [18] 布鲁诺?拉图尔. 科学在行动：怎样在社会中跟随科学家和工程师[M]. 刘文旋, 郑开,译. 北京: 东方出版社, 2005:62. [19] 刘珺珺著.科学社会学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社, 2009:138. [20] Hambrick D C. The field of management's devotion to theory: too much of a good thing?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(6): 1346-1352. [21] Leek J T, Peng R D. Opinion: adopting a prevention approach[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015, 112(6): 1645-1646. [22] Leung K. Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: ethical and theoretical issues[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2011, 7(3): 471-479. [23] 李绪红, 贾良定, 朱丹阳.鼓励负责任的科学研究：主流期刊的声音[M]//徐淑英, 李绪红, 贾良定等.负责任的管理研究：哲学与实践.北京:北京大学出版社,2018:406.

全文引文分析视角下的造假论文学术影响研究

Research on the impact of fraudulent paper to the academia from the view of citation analysis in full-text——Case study of two highly cited retracted publications

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	章娟段志光于琦李文丽张瑜. 论文影响力与变异视角的科学家学术影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(5): 676-680.
[2]	胡志刚林歌歌刘则渊. 经典常宜回头看，生前身后二十年 ——赵红州先生的科学学贡献及影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(12): 1780-1789.
[3]	缪亚军戚巍钟琪. 科学家学术年龄特征研究——基于学术生产力与影响力的二维视角[J]. , 2013, (2): 177-183.