• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 2193-2203.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权政策如何提升国家创新能力? ———基于政策工具的组态分析

林德明1,罗宇晴2,2,刘文斌3   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学人文学院科学学与科技管理研究所
    2.
    3. 英国肯特大学商学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-24 修回日期:2023-01-31 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2023-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘文斌
  • 基金资助:
    具有随机场系数的偏微分方程反问题自适应计算方法研究

  • Received:2022-10-24 Revised:2023-01-31 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-15

摘要: 知识产权政策的有效运用是提升国家创新能力的关键因素。运用政策工具分析方法和QCA分析方法,对2009-2022年我国知识产权政策工具进行实证分析,探究不同类型知识产权政策工具提升我国创新能力的多元路径。结果表明:整体上我国更注重使用管理型和保护型知识产权政策工具,而创造型和运用型应用较少;知识产权政策工具在提升我国创新能力时存在多重并发效应,具体的组态解包括创新激励型、政府主导型、运用促进型和协同保护型,其中驱动高质量知识产权创造并施以严格的政策保护是主要的国家创新推动力;我国在实施知识产权战略时存在着部分管理型政策工具的失灵,并且管理型政策工具的使用不当可能会抑制运用型政策工具发挥作用。

Abstract: The efficiency of Intellectual Property (IP) policies is one of the essential impetuses in enhancing national innovation capabilities. The policy tool method and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method are applied to empirically analyze China's IP policy tools in the period from 2009 to 2022, to explore the multiple paths that IP policy tools improve China's innovation capability. The results implicate that China focuses more on the use of management-based and protection-based IP policy tools overall, and less on the application of creation-based and application-based ones; there are multiple concurrent effects of IP policy tools in enhancing China's innovation capacity, further the configuration solutions of QCA are innovation-incentive, government-leading, application-promoting and collaborative-protection, among which driving high-quality IP creation under the strict protection is the main force boosting the innovation capacity; some management-based policy tools are unstuck, then the impertinent utilization of management-based policy tools may inhibit the effectiveness of application-based policy tools.