• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 713-720.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术标准竞争、未来产业发展与国家战略博弈

毛 昊1,柏 杨2   

  1. 1. 同济大学上海国际知识产权学院
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-03 修回日期:2023-10-05 出版日期:2024-04-15 发布日期:2024-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 毛 昊
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金年度项目

  • Received:2023-02-03 Revised:2023-10-05 Online:2024-04-15 Published:2024-04-15

摘要: 随着未来技术发展和新兴市场拓展,部分国家从维护产业安全和国家利益出发,动用国家力量介入SEP技术标准活动,在全球范围内引发SEP技术标准许可费率的对抗性裁判,干扰了创新主体预期和市场营商环境,产生了对技术扩散和产业发展的阻碍效应。为更好适应由SEP全球许可费率引发的技术标准定价和国家竞争博弈环境变化,我国应当以更大的力度参与技术贸易市场规则秩序构建,支持中国企业逐步掌握全球技术标准定价机制主动权:司法层面,设定产业安全底线,积极审慎地实施反制约举措,制定符合国情创新特征的司法许可费率裁判规则;行政层面,强调行政机构在技术标准价格管辖中的协调作用,搭建SEP诚信许可谈判环境,发挥国家专利审查机构SEP许可费率价格锚定功能;国际规则治理层面,依托双边与小多边经济贸易往来构建区域性管辖权分配新秩序,推进中国参与设计和完善国际公约对管辖权分配的程序性条款,继而构建起一套市场优先、行政引导、司法兜底、国际协调的技术标准全球公共治理框架。

Abstract: With the development of future technology and the expansion of emerging markets, some countries, from the perspective of safeguarding industrial security and national interests, use their state power to intervene in technical standards activities. Which triggers the adversarial judgment of SEP license rate globally, interferes with the expectation of technological innovation and market business environment, and has an obstructive effect on technology diffusion and industrial development. In order to better adapt to the changes of state bargaining environment caused by the SEP global license rate issues, China should make greater efforts to participate in the construction of technology trade market rules and order, and support Chinese enterprises to gradually seize the initiative of global technical standard pricing mechanism: At the judicial level, the bottom line of industrial safety should be set, anti-restriction measures should be implemented actively and prudently, and judicial license rate adjudication rules should be formulated in line with the innovation characteristics of national conditions. At the administrative level, emphasizing the coordinating role of administrative agencies in the jurisdiction of technical standard pricing, making a faithful environment for the patent licensing negotiations, and giving play to the anchoring function of national patent examination agencies. At the level of international governance, a new order of regional jurisdiction should be made based on bilateral and multilateral economic and trade relations. Moreover, China should participate in the design and improvement of the procedural provisions of international conventions on jurisdiction. Then build a global public governance framework which puts the market first, supplies with administrative guidance, ensures there is a judicial cushion in need and emphasizes international coordination.