[1] 国务院. 国务院关于全面加强基础科学研究的若干意见 [Z]//国务院. 2018
[2] PACKALEN M, BHATTACHARYA J. Does the NIH Fund Edge Science? [R]: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018.
[3] BOL T, DE VAAN M, VAN DE RIJT A. The Matthew effect in science funding [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(19): 4887-90.
[4] HEGDE D, SAMPAT B. Can private money buy public science [J]. Disease group lobbying and federal funding for biomedical research (July 16, 2014) Forthcoming in Management Science, 2015.
[5] AZOULAY P, LI D, ZIVIN J S G, et al. Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules [J]. The Review of economic studies, 2019, 86(1): 117-52.
[6] AZOULAY P, LI D. Scientific grant funding [M]. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, 2020.
[7] 阿儒涵, 王诗航, 李晓轩. 稳定拨款与项目资助的资助差异性研究——基于2009-2018日本化学领域资助产出的数据分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(06): 1067-73.
[8] IOANNIDIS J P A. Fund people not projects [J]. Nature, 2011, 477(7366): 529-31.
[9] SUN Y, CAO C. Planning for science: China’s “grand experiment” and global implications [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2021, 8(1): 215.
[10] JOYNSON C, LEYSER O. The culture of scientific research [J]. F1000Research, 2015, 4: 66.
[11] DAVIES B, GUSH J, HENDY S C, et al. Research funding and collaboration [J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(2): 104421.
[12] AYOUBI C, PEZZONI M, VISENTIN F. The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions? [J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(1): 84-97.
[13] AZOULAY P, FUCHS E, GOLDSTEIN A P, et al. Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the “ARPA Model” [J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2019, 19: 69-96.
[14] DRESLER M, BUDDEBERG E, ENDESFELDER U, et al. Why many funding schemes harm rather than support research [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6(5): 607-8.
[15] LAUDEL G, GLAESER J. Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding [J]. Research Policy, 2014, 43(7): 1204-16.
[16] WANG J, LEE Y-N, WALSH J P. Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects [J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(6): 1070-83.
[17] FRANZONI C, STEPHAN P, VEUGELERS R. Funding Risky Research [J]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2021, No. 28905.
[18] GEWIN V. Risky research: The sky's the limit [J]. Nature, 2012, 487(7407): 395-7.
[19] OECD. Effective policies to foster high-risk/high-reward research [J]. 2021.
[20] TINKLE S, MARY J, SNAVELY J, et al. An Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Director’s New Innovator Award Program for Fiscal Years 2007–2009 [M]. 2016.
[21] 曹玲静, 张志强. 发展高风险高回报研究的科技政策机制 [J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5): 13.
[22] WANG J, LEE Y N, WALSH J P. Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects [J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(6): 1070-83.
[23] 迟培娟, 宋秀芳, 冷伏海. 美国科技政策科学研究计划的成果及影响力分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(01): 73-82.
[24] FORTUNATO S, BERGSTROM C T, B?RNER K, et al. Science of science [J]. Science, 2018, 359(6379): eaao0185.
[25] YANG Y, TIAN T Y, WOODRUFF T K, et al. Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022, 119(36): e2200841119.
[26] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M, et al. Atypical combinations and scientific impact [J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-72.
[27] RADICCHI F, FORTUNATO S, CASTELLANO C. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(45): 17268-72.
[28] WANG Y, LI N, ZHANG B, et al. The effect of structural holes on producing novel and disruptive research in physics [J]. Scientometrics, 2023, 128(3): 1801-23.
[29] WANG Y, JONES B F, WANG D. Early-career setback and future career impact [J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-10.
[30] AZOULAY P, STUART T, WANG Y. Matthew: Effect or Fable? [J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(1): 92-109.
[31] B.A. JACOB L L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95: 1168-77.
[32] 田人合, 张志强, 王非, et al. 基于 DID 模型的科技政策创新能力资助效应实证研究——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例 [J]. 情报学报, 2018, 37(8): 782-95.
[33] AZOULAY P, GRAFF ZIVIN J S, MANSO G. Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2011, 42(3): 527-54.
[34] SIMONTON D K. Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks [J]. Psychological review, 1997, 104(1): 66.
[35] JONES B F. Age and great invention [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 92(1): 1-14.
[36] JONES B F, REEDY E J, WEINBERG B A. Age and scientific genius [M]. The Wiley Handbook of Genius. wiley. 2014: 422-50.
[37] LI M, LIVAN G, RIGHI S. Quantifying the dynamics of peak innovation in scientific careers [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:230106374, 2023.
[38] 于璇, 高瑞平. 科学基金助力女性科研人员成长:政策、成效与展望 [J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(02): 265-76.
[39] 崔林蔚. 科研人员科研产出及影响力性别分层的研究进展 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(07): 1239-47.
[40] 黄园淅, 赵吝加. 我国女性科研人员发展现状、挑战及政策演变 [J]. 中国科学基金, 2018, 32(06): 622-8.
[41] RZHETSKY A, FOSTER J G, FOSTER I T, et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112(47): 14569-74.
[42] JIA T, WANG D, SZYMANSKI B K. Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2017, 1(4): 0078.
[43] ZENG A, SHEN Z, ZHOU J, et al. Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics [J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 3439.
[44] HILL R, YIN Y, STEIN C, et al. Adaptability and the pivot penalty in science [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:210706476, 2021.
[45] LIU L, DEHMAMY N, CHOWN J, et al. Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers [J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 5392.
[46] NIH. NIH Director's New Innovator Award [Z]. 2023
[47] NIH. NIH Research Project Grant Program (R01) [Z]. 2023
[48] RZHETSKY A, FOSTER J G, FOSTER I T, et al. Choosing Experiments to Accelerate Collective Discovery [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, (in press)(47): 14569-74.
[49] FOSTER J G, RZHETSKY A, EVANS J A. Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.
[50] GUIMERà R, UZZI B, SPIRO J, et al. Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance [J]. Science, 2005, 308(5722): 697-702.
[51] BLONDEL V, GUILLAUME J-L, LAMBIOTTE R, et al. Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks [J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment, 2008, 2008.
[52] 国务院. 国务院印发关于深化中央财政科技计划(专项、基金等)管理改革方案的通知 [Z]//国务院. 2014
[53] BROMHAM L, DINNAGE R, HUA X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success [J]. Nature, 2016, 534.
[54] WANG J, VEUGELERS R, STEPHAN P. Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators [J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-36.
[55] FRANZONI C, STEPHAN P. Uncertainty and Risk-Taking in Science: Meaning, Measurement and Management in Peer Review of Research Proposals [J]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2021, No. 28562.
[56] 国家自然科学基金委员会. 2023 年国家自然科学基金项目指南-青年科学基金项目 [Z]//国家自然科学基金委员会. 2023 |